Softs

Softs

Softs

Agricultural products that are grown rather than mined, such as coffee, sugar, and cocoa, forming a major segment of the global commodities market.

Agricultural products that are grown rather than mined, such as coffee, sugar, and cocoa, forming a major segment of the global commodities market.

SCROLL

SCROLL

Previous report

Previous report

Weekly Report
2024-11-12

Next report

Next report

Overall

Victor Davis Hanson


Content

2024-11-12

Our Elections Utter Losers and Winners Deservedly Losers The pollswith the exception once again of AltasIntel, Trafalgar, and Rasmussenwere off, and way off in the Senate races. The pollsters reputation is again in full reverse and now back to their nadir of 2020 and 2016. Many shamelessly warped their data in the last two weeks to gin up Harris momentum, fund-raising, and voter turnout. And to no avail. There were plenty of indications long ago in key states of a Trump thunderstorm: defections of minorities, anger among both the Jewish and Muslim voters, alienated union members, massive increases in Republican registrations and non-Election-Day balloting. And all were deliberately ignored by the corrupt media and pollsters. Democrats know but will do nothing about the factthey have become the party of the upscale professionals and rich, and the subsidized poor. They have alienated the entire middle classwhite, black, Hispanicand ceding it to the new Republican populist-nationalist party. Open borders, hyperinflation, abortion deification, the transgendered mania, the crime wave, and the green obsessions all did their bit to repel voters. The racist Trump won more minority support than any Dole, McCain, or Romney figure of the past. What now will the buffoonish Alvin Bragg, Fani Willis, and Jack Smith do with their pseudo-indictments and convictions? Try to nullify an American election by putting the president-elect in jail, as the projectionist and now paranoid Left screams that a soon to be President Trump might lawfare them in the manner they did him? Democrat incumbent senators by late September knew their internal polls were bleeding. So, they decided to junk their lifelong voting records, ideology, and transient fealty to Harris, and chameleon-like to absorb the Trump agendas. That proved too fake and opportunistic for most voters. Remember, we will soon be soon back to 2017-era leftwing hysteria. The Left, as it licks its numerous wounds, will reemerge soon to get back the House and impeach Trump, riot on Inauguration Day, gin up more lawfare with hackish local and state prosecutors, insert more deep-state Anonymous obstructors into the swamp, draft more has-been generals to trash their commander-in-chief, and reach for the absurdities like the Logan Act, 25th Amendment or more collusion myths. After all, the party that said democracy was on the ballot is now the most anti-democratic force in modern history. Will a Josh Shapiro try to do a Bill Clinton on the Democratic Party as the latter did after the McGovern/Carter disasters? Winners? Donald Trump, of course. After a decade of Russian collusion farces, laptop disinformation ruses, two impeachments, attempted ballot removal, five civil and criminal suits, two assassination attempts, and a swat team raid on his home, the indestructible 78-year-old Trump has just pulled off the greatest political comeback in presidential history. Trump was out-funded by Harris. The media gave him 95 percent negative coverage. The glitterati trashed him nonstop and even stooped to sabotage Saturday Night Live, in vain, to stop him. The ridiculous Obamas jetted out of their mansions to lie about Trump nonstop and talk down to their own voters. All they proved was that the phantom, supposedly miracle Michelle Obama candidacy would have been even worse than Harris. An arrogant Oprah and the View really believed people believed their gossipy paranoia about Trump. In the end, Trump proved more energetic and industrious than Harris, smarter than seasoned politicos, and utterly authentic, preferring to be genuine and occasionally crude than the inauthentic and sappy Harris. He may likely be the first Republican to win 51 percent of the vote since 1988, and the first to win the popular vote in twenty years. As a general rule, those in the conservative and Republican movements who stood by Trump have won with him. Those who damned him ended up inert or wandering aimlessly in the political wilderness. What happens to the Liz Cheneys and Larry Hogans of the world? There are no now more Never Trump conservatives. That is a misnomer for those who were after a decade mostly either leftwing or subsidized by the Left as useful idiotsor irrelevant. Contrast all that with the even more ascendent and buoyant mavericks like Elon Musk, RFK, Jr., Joe Rogan, and Tulsi Gabbard. I watched the tears, denial, and fury of the MSNBC and CNN crowd as they struggled first to fantasize nonexistent pathways to victory, then to revisit Russian collusion and lawfare, then to claim the proverbial nave and stupid electorate was deluded into voting against its real interests (as defined by MSNBC grandees), and finally to announce that the worldcurrently on the nuclear precipice of Biden-induced, escalating, theater-wide warswill be aghast at the will of the American people. In other words, the political-media Leftist fusion sermonized about everything other than why they were rejected by the American people. What a pathetic bunch our media have become. And lastly Biden? The left who dreamed up the 2020 idea of using the fake ol Joe Biden from Scranton as moderate cover for the hard-left agendadoes not know whether to blame Joe for not getting out earlier, or to claim their July coup was now a mistake and they would have been better off with a candidate cognitively challenged by dementia rather than one by innate inability. So, Democrats will blame everyone and everythingexcept themselves who sought to drive down the American peoples throat the most radical and absurd agenda of the last two centuries that ruined the economy, exploded our border, made moonscapes of our big cities, destroyed womens sports, set the world abroad afire, weaponized the courts and the bureaucracies, and sought to tear the country in two. RIP to all that. https://t.co/30zki2pece.

Victor Davis Hanson


Content

2024-11-12

Our Elections Utter Losers and Winners Deservedly Losers The pollswith the exception once again of AltasIntel, Trafalgar, and Rasmussenwere off, and way off in the Senate races. The pollsters reputation is again in full reverse and now back to their nadir of 2020 and 2016. Many shamelessly warped their data in the last two weeks to gin up Harris momentum, fund-raising, and voter turnout. And to no avail. There were plenty of indications long ago in key states of a Trump thunderstorm: defections of minorities, anger among both the Jewish and Muslim voters, alienated union members, massive increases in Republican registrations and non-Election-Day balloting. And all were deliberately ignored by the corrupt media and pollsters. Democrats know but will do nothing about the factthey have become the party of the upscale professionals and rich, and the subsidized poor. They have alienated the entire middle classwhite, black, Hispanicand ceding it to the new Republican populist-nationalist party. Open borders, hyperinflation, abortion deification, the transgendered mania, the crime wave, and the green obsessions all did their bit to repel voters. The racist Trump won more minority support than any Dole, McCain, or Romney figure of the past. What now will the buffoonish Alvin Bragg, Fani Willis, and Jack Smith do with their pseudo-indictments and convictions? Try to nullify an American election by putting the president-elect in jail, as the projectionist and now paranoid Left screams that a soon to be President Trump might lawfare them in the manner they did him? Democrat incumbent senators by late September knew their internal polls were bleeding. So, they decided to junk their lifelong voting records, ideology, and transient fealty to Harris, and chameleon-like to absorb the Trump agendas. That proved too fake and opportunistic for most voters. Remember, we will soon be soon back to 2017-era leftwing hysteria. The Left, as it licks its numerous wounds, will reemerge soon to get back the House and impeach Trump, riot on Inauguration Day, gin up more lawfare with hackish local and state prosecutors, insert more deep-state Anonymous obstructors into the swamp, draft more has-been generals to trash their commander-in-chief, and reach for the absurdities like the Logan Act, 25th Amendment or more collusion myths. After all, the party that said democracy was on the ballot is now the most anti-democratic force in modern history. Will a Josh Shapiro try to do a Bill Clinton on the Democratic Party as the latter did after the McGovern/Carter disasters? Winners? Donald Trump, of course. After a decade of Russian collusion farces, laptop disinformation ruses, two impeachments, attempted ballot removal, five civil and criminal suits, two assassination attempts, and a swat team raid on his home, the indestructible 78-year-old Trump has just pulled off the greatest political comeback in presidential history. Trump was out-funded by Harris. The media gave him 95 percent negative coverage. The glitterati trashed him nonstop and even stooped to sabotage Saturday Night Live, in vain, to stop him. The ridiculous Obamas jetted out of their mansions to lie about Trump nonstop and talk down to their own voters. All they proved was that the phantom, supposedly miracle Michelle Obama candidacy would have been even worse than Harris. An arrogant Oprah and the View really believed people believed their gossipy paranoia about Trump. In the end, Trump proved more energetic and industrious than Harris, smarter than seasoned politicos, and utterly authentic, preferring to be genuine and occasionally crude than the inauthentic and sappy Harris. He may likely be the first Republican to win 51 percent of the vote since 1988, and the first to win the popular vote in twenty years. As a general rule, those in the conservative and Republican movements who stood by Trump have won with him. Those who damned him ended up inert or wandering aimlessly in the political wilderness. What happens to the Liz Cheneys and Larry Hogans of the world? There are no now more Never Trump conservatives. That is a misnomer for those who were after a decade mostly either leftwing or subsidized by the Left as useful idiotsor irrelevant. Contrast all that with the even more ascendent and buoyant mavericks like Elon Musk, RFK, Jr., Joe Rogan, and Tulsi Gabbard. I watched the tears, denial, and fury of the MSNBC and CNN crowd as they struggled first to fantasize nonexistent pathways to victory, then to revisit Russian collusion and lawfare, then to claim the proverbial nave and stupid electorate was deluded into voting against its real interests (as defined by MSNBC grandees), and finally to announce that the worldcurrently on the nuclear precipice of Biden-induced, escalating, theater-wide warswill be aghast at the will of the American people. In other words, the political-media Leftist fusion sermonized about everything other than why they were rejected by the American people. What a pathetic bunch our media have become. And lastly Biden? The left who dreamed up the 2020 idea of using the fake ol Joe Biden from Scranton as moderate cover for the hard-left agendadoes not know whether to blame Joe for not getting out earlier, or to claim their July coup was now a mistake and they would have been better off with a candidate cognitively challenged by dementia rather than one by innate inability. So, Democrats will blame everyone and everythingexcept themselves who sought to drive down the American peoples throat the most radical and absurd agenda of the last two centuries that ruined the economy, exploded our border, made moonscapes of our big cities, destroyed womens sports, set the world abroad afire, weaponized the courts and the bureaucracies, and sought to tear the country in two. RIP to all that. https://t.co/30zki2pece.

Victor Davis Hanson


Content

2024-11-12

Our Elections Utter Losers and Winners Deservedly Losers The pollswith the exception once again of AltasIntel, Trafalgar, and Rasmussenwere off, and way off in the Senate races. The pollsters reputation is again in full reverse and now back to their nadir of 2020 and 2016. Many shamelessly warped their data in the last two weeks to gin up Harris momentum, fund-raising, and voter turnout. And to no avail. There were plenty of indications long ago in key states of a Trump thunderstorm: defections of minorities, anger among both the Jewish and Muslim voters, alienated union members, massive increases in Republican registrations and non-Election-Day balloting. And all were deliberately ignored by the corrupt media and pollsters. Democrats know but will do nothing about the factthey have become the party of the upscale professionals and rich, and the subsidized poor. They have alienated the entire middle classwhite, black, Hispanicand ceding it to the new Republican populist-nationalist party. Open borders, hyperinflation, abortion deification, the transgendered mania, the crime wave, and the green obsessions all did their bit to repel voters. The racist Trump won more minority support than any Dole, McCain, or Romney figure of the past. What now will the buffoonish Alvin Bragg, Fani Willis, and Jack Smith do with their pseudo-indictments and convictions? Try to nullify an American election by putting the president-elect in jail, as the projectionist and now paranoid Left screams that a soon to be President Trump might lawfare them in the manner they did him? Democrat incumbent senators by late September knew their internal polls were bleeding. So, they decided to junk their lifelong voting records, ideology, and transient fealty to Harris, and chameleon-like to absorb the Trump agendas. That proved too fake and opportunistic for most voters. Remember, we will soon be soon back to 2017-era leftwing hysteria. The Left, as it licks its numerous wounds, will reemerge soon to get back the House and impeach Trump, riot on Inauguration Day, gin up more lawfare with hackish local and state prosecutors, insert more deep-state Anonymous obstructors into the swamp, draft more has-been generals to trash their commander-in-chief, and reach for the absurdities like the Logan Act, 25th Amendment or more collusion myths. After all, the party that said democracy was on the ballot is now the most anti-democratic force in modern history. Will a Josh Shapiro try to do a Bill Clinton on the Democratic Party as the latter did after the McGovern/Carter disasters? Winners? Donald Trump, of course. After a decade of Russian collusion farces, laptop disinformation ruses, two impeachments, attempted ballot removal, five civil and criminal suits, two assassination attempts, and a swat team raid on his home, the indestructible 78-year-old Trump has just pulled off the greatest political comeback in presidential history. Trump was out-funded by Harris. The media gave him 95 percent negative coverage. The glitterati trashed him nonstop and even stooped to sabotage Saturday Night Live, in vain, to stop him. The ridiculous Obamas jetted out of their mansions to lie about Trump nonstop and talk down to their own voters. All they proved was that the phantom, supposedly miracle Michelle Obama candidacy would have been even worse than Harris. An arrogant Oprah and the View really believed people believed their gossipy paranoia about Trump. In the end, Trump proved more energetic and industrious than Harris, smarter than seasoned politicos, and utterly authentic, preferring to be genuine and occasionally crude than the inauthentic and sappy Harris. He may likely be the first Republican to win 51 percent of the vote since 1988, and the first to win the popular vote in twenty years. As a general rule, those in the conservative and Republican movements who stood by Trump have won with him. Those who damned him ended up inert or wandering aimlessly in the political wilderness. What happens to the Liz Cheneys and Larry Hogans of the world? There are no now more Never Trump conservatives. That is a misnomer for those who were after a decade mostly either leftwing or subsidized by the Left as useful idiotsor irrelevant. Contrast all that with the even more ascendent and buoyant mavericks like Elon Musk, RFK, Jr., Joe Rogan, and Tulsi Gabbard. I watched the tears, denial, and fury of the MSNBC and CNN crowd as they struggled first to fantasize nonexistent pathways to victory, then to revisit Russian collusion and lawfare, then to claim the proverbial nave and stupid electorate was deluded into voting against its real interests (as defined by MSNBC grandees), and finally to announce that the worldcurrently on the nuclear precipice of Biden-induced, escalating, theater-wide warswill be aghast at the will of the American people. In other words, the political-media Leftist fusion sermonized about everything other than why they were rejected by the American people. What a pathetic bunch our media have become. And lastly Biden? The left who dreamed up the 2020 idea of using the fake ol Joe Biden from Scranton as moderate cover for the hard-left agendadoes not know whether to blame Joe for not getting out earlier, or to claim their July coup was now a mistake and they would have been better off with a candidate cognitively challenged by dementia rather than one by innate inability. So, Democrats will blame everyone and everythingexcept themselves who sought to drive down the American peoples throat the most radical and absurd agenda of the last two centuries that ruined the economy, exploded our border, made moonscapes of our big cities, destroyed womens sports, set the world abroad afire, weaponized the courts and the bureaucracies, and sought to tear the country in two. RIP to all that. https://t.co/30zki2pece.

Victor Davis Hanson


Content

2024-11-12

Our Elections Utter Losers and Winners Deservedly Losers The pollswith the exception once again of AltasIntel, Trafalgar, and Rasmussenwere off, and way off in the Senate races. The pollsters reputation is again in full reverse and now back to their nadir of 2020 and 2016. Many shamelessly warped their data in the last two weeks to gin up Harris momentum, fund-raising, and voter turnout. And to no avail. There were plenty of indications long ago in key states of a Trump thunderstorm: defections of minorities, anger among both the Jewish and Muslim voters, alienated union members, massive increases in Republican registrations and non-Election-Day balloting. And all were deliberately ignored by the corrupt media and pollsters. Democrats know but will do nothing about the factthey have become the party of the upscale professionals and rich, and the subsidized poor. They have alienated the entire middle classwhite, black, Hispanicand ceding it to the new Republican populist-nationalist party. Open borders, hyperinflation, abortion deification, the transgendered mania, the crime wave, and the green obsessions all did their bit to repel voters. The racist Trump won more minority support than any Dole, McCain, or Romney figure of the past. What now will the buffoonish Alvin Bragg, Fani Willis, and Jack Smith do with their pseudo-indictments and convictions? Try to nullify an American election by putting the president-elect in jail, as the projectionist and now paranoid Left screams that a soon to be President Trump might lawfare them in the manner they did him? Democrat incumbent senators by late September knew their internal polls were bleeding. So, they decided to junk their lifelong voting records, ideology, and transient fealty to Harris, and chameleon-like to absorb the Trump agendas. That proved too fake and opportunistic for most voters. Remember, we will soon be soon back to 2017-era leftwing hysteria. The Left, as it licks its numerous wounds, will reemerge soon to get back the House and impeach Trump, riot on Inauguration Day, gin up more lawfare with hackish local and state prosecutors, insert more deep-state Anonymous obstructors into the swamp, draft more has-been generals to trash their commander-in-chief, and reach for the absurdities like the Logan Act, 25th Amendment or more collusion myths. After all, the party that said democracy was on the ballot is now the most anti-democratic force in modern history. Will a Josh Shapiro try to do a Bill Clinton on the Democratic Party as the latter did after the McGovern/Carter disasters? Winners? Donald Trump, of course. After a decade of Russian collusion farces, laptop disinformation ruses, two impeachments, attempted ballot removal, five civil and criminal suits, two assassination attempts, and a swat team raid on his home, the indestructible 78-year-old Trump has just pulled off the greatest political comeback in presidential history. Trump was out-funded by Harris. The media gave him 95 percent negative coverage. The glitterati trashed him nonstop and even stooped to sabotage Saturday Night Live, in vain, to stop him. The ridiculous Obamas jetted out of their mansions to lie about Trump nonstop and talk down to their own voters. All they proved was that the phantom, supposedly miracle Michelle Obama candidacy would have been even worse than Harris. An arrogant Oprah and the View really believed people believed their gossipy paranoia about Trump. In the end, Trump proved more energetic and industrious than Harris, smarter than seasoned politicos, and utterly authentic, preferring to be genuine and occasionally crude than the inauthentic and sappy Harris. He may likely be the first Republican to win 51 percent of the vote since 1988, and the first to win the popular vote in twenty years. As a general rule, those in the conservative and Republican movements who stood by Trump have won with him. Those who damned him ended up inert or wandering aimlessly in the political wilderness. What happens to the Liz Cheneys and Larry Hogans of the world? There are no now more Never Trump conservatives. That is a misnomer for those who were after a decade mostly either leftwing or subsidized by the Left as useful idiotsor irrelevant. Contrast all that with the even more ascendent and buoyant mavericks like Elon Musk, RFK, Jr., Joe Rogan, and Tulsi Gabbard. I watched the tears, denial, and fury of the MSNBC and CNN crowd as they struggled first to fantasize nonexistent pathways to victory, then to revisit Russian collusion and lawfare, then to claim the proverbial nave and stupid electorate was deluded into voting against its real interests (as defined by MSNBC grandees), and finally to announce that the worldcurrently on the nuclear precipice of Biden-induced, escalating, theater-wide warswill be aghast at the will of the American people. In other words, the political-media Leftist fusion sermonized about everything other than why they were rejected by the American people. What a pathetic bunch our media have become. And lastly Biden? The left who dreamed up the 2020 idea of using the fake ol Joe Biden from Scranton as moderate cover for the hard-left agendadoes not know whether to blame Joe for not getting out earlier, or to claim their July coup was now a mistake and they would have been better off with a candidate cognitively challenged by dementia rather than one by innate inability. So, Democrats will blame everyone and everythingexcept themselves who sought to drive down the American peoples throat the most radical and absurd agenda of the last two centuries that ruined the economy, exploded our border, made moonscapes of our big cities, destroyed womens sports, set the world abroad afire, weaponized the courts and the bureaucracies, and sought to tear the country in two. RIP to all that. https://t.co/30zki2pece.

Jeffrey P. Snider


Content

2024-11-12

While everyone was understandably glued to the US election, they missed a big one for the global economy. Gasoil demand is now contracting. Thats huge because gasoil basically all kinds of diesel goes into everything. And since energy use is price inelastic, that means if the world is using less its only because less is happening in the economy. i.e., recession Demand is so weak, theres about to be a surplus of oil. 1. **Declining Fuel Demand**: The International Energy Agency (IEA) has reported a rare decline in global demand for gas oil (diesel) in 2024. Last time it happened was 2020, before that 2016 when the global economy plunged (not just China). 2. **Ongoing Supply Glut in Oil Markets**: Falling demand for diesel and other oil products is leading to oversupply in the market. OPEC has been delaying production restoration in response to weak demand. Cartel was supposed to start restoring production at the end of this month after being delayed in September. Now theyre saying maybe by 2025. 3. **Global Economic Weakness**: The downturn is not limited to specific regions but is a global phenomenon affecting advanced economies and emerging markets like India and China. This isnt just an Asia thing. Advanced economies are very much a big part of the trouble. 4. **Manufacturing and Auto Industry Struggles**: Looking at energy demand from the other side, major automakers, including Nissan and Ford, are facing significant challenges with declining sales and rising inventory levels. Nissan just announced a 30% production cut for North American models due to these issues specifically in the US, forecasting further layoffs and reduced workforce hours. You cant get away from energy usage. If demand is falling, its because the economy is. Even with OPEC continuing to hold back on production, the markets are expecting a supply glut anyway. No contribution from the Beijing bazooka nor a positive effect from Fed/ECB/etc. rate theater. This is why war in the Middle East barely registers in oil prices anymore. https://t.co/VF4qdJLkUB https://t.co/aDdYRnU6lP https://t.co/SlhiiV7U2m.

Jeffrey P. Snider


Content

2024-11-12

While everyone was understandably glued to the US election, they missed a big one for the global economy. Gasoil demand is now contracting. Thats huge because gasoil basically all kinds of diesel goes into everything. And since energy use is price inelastic, that means if the world is using less its only because less is happening in the economy. i.e., recession Demand is so weak, theres about to be a surplus of oil. 1. **Declining Fuel Demand**: The International Energy Agency (IEA) has reported a rare decline in global demand for gas oil (diesel) in 2024. Last time it happened was 2020, before that 2016 when the global economy plunged (not just China). 2. **Ongoing Supply Glut in Oil Markets**: Falling demand for diesel and other oil products is leading to oversupply in the market. OPEC has been delaying production restoration in response to weak demand. Cartel was supposed to start restoring production at the end of this month after being delayed in September. Now theyre saying maybe by 2025. 3. **Global Economic Weakness**: The downturn is not limited to specific regions but is a global phenomenon affecting advanced economies and emerging markets like India and China. This isnt just an Asia thing. Advanced economies are very much a big part of the trouble. 4. **Manufacturing and Auto Industry Struggles**: Looking at energy demand from the other side, major automakers, including Nissan and Ford, are facing significant challenges with declining sales and rising inventory levels. Nissan just announced a 30% production cut for North American models due to these issues specifically in the US, forecasting further layoffs and reduced workforce hours. You cant get away from energy usage. If demand is falling, its because the economy is. Even with OPEC continuing to hold back on production, the markets are expecting a supply glut anyway. No contribution from the Beijing bazooka nor a positive effect from Fed/ECB/etc. rate theater. This is why war in the Middle East barely registers in oil prices anymore. https://t.co/VF4qdJLkUB https://t.co/aDdYRnU6lP https://t.co/SlhiiV7U2m.

Jeffrey P. Snider


Content

2024-11-12

While everyone was understandably glued to the US election, they missed a big one for the global economy. Gasoil demand is now contracting. Thats huge because gasoil basically all kinds of diesel goes into everything. And since energy use is price inelastic, that means if the world is using less its only because less is happening in the economy. i.e., recession Demand is so weak, theres about to be a surplus of oil. 1. **Declining Fuel Demand**: The International Energy Agency (IEA) has reported a rare decline in global demand for gas oil (diesel) in 2024. Last time it happened was 2020, before that 2016 when the global economy plunged (not just China). 2. **Ongoing Supply Glut in Oil Markets**: Falling demand for diesel and other oil products is leading to oversupply in the market. OPEC has been delaying production restoration in response to weak demand. Cartel was supposed to start restoring production at the end of this month after being delayed in September. Now theyre saying maybe by 2025. 3. **Global Economic Weakness**: The downturn is not limited to specific regions but is a global phenomenon affecting advanced economies and emerging markets like India and China. This isnt just an Asia thing. Advanced economies are very much a big part of the trouble. 4. **Manufacturing and Auto Industry Struggles**: Looking at energy demand from the other side, major automakers, including Nissan and Ford, are facing significant challenges with declining sales and rising inventory levels. Nissan just announced a 30% production cut for North American models due to these issues specifically in the US, forecasting further layoffs and reduced workforce hours. You cant get away from energy usage. If demand is falling, its because the economy is. Even with OPEC continuing to hold back on production, the markets are expecting a supply glut anyway. No contribution from the Beijing bazooka nor a positive effect from Fed/ECB/etc. rate theater. This is why war in the Middle East barely registers in oil prices anymore. https://t.co/VF4qdJLkUB https://t.co/aDdYRnU6lP https://t.co/SlhiiV7U2m.

Jeffrey P. Snider


Content

2024-11-12

While everyone was understandably glued to the US election, they missed a big one for the global economy. Gasoil demand is now contracting. Thats huge because gasoil basically all kinds of diesel goes into everything. And since energy use is price inelastic, that means if the world is using less its only because less is happening in the economy. i.e., recession Demand is so weak, theres about to be a surplus of oil. 1. **Declining Fuel Demand**: The International Energy Agency (IEA) has reported a rare decline in global demand for gas oil (diesel) in 2024. Last time it happened was 2020, before that 2016 when the global economy plunged (not just China). 2. **Ongoing Supply Glut in Oil Markets**: Falling demand for diesel and other oil products is leading to oversupply in the market. OPEC has been delaying production restoration in response to weak demand. Cartel was supposed to start restoring production at the end of this month after being delayed in September. Now theyre saying maybe by 2025. 3. **Global Economic Weakness**: The downturn is not limited to specific regions but is a global phenomenon affecting advanced economies and emerging markets like India and China. This isnt just an Asia thing. Advanced economies are very much a big part of the trouble. 4. **Manufacturing and Auto Industry Struggles**: Looking at energy demand from the other side, major automakers, including Nissan and Ford, are facing significant challenges with declining sales and rising inventory levels. Nissan just announced a 30% production cut for North American models due to these issues specifically in the US, forecasting further layoffs and reduced workforce hours. You cant get away from energy usage. If demand is falling, its because the economy is. Even with OPEC continuing to hold back on production, the markets are expecting a supply glut anyway. No contribution from the Beijing bazooka nor a positive effect from Fed/ECB/etc. rate theater. This is why war in the Middle East barely registers in oil prices anymore. https://t.co/VF4qdJLkUB https://t.co/aDdYRnU6lP https://t.co/SlhiiV7U2m.

Wandile Sihlobo


Content

2024-11-12

South Africa must remain a reliable food supplier to Southern Africa South Africas agriculture and agribusiness sectors have a broader responsibility for food security beyond our borders. The Southern Africa region leans heavily on South Africa for food supplies. This is clear from the observation of South Africas agricultural exports. The country exported about US$13,2 billion of agricultural and processed food products in 2023, according to data from Trade Map. Nearly 40% of these exports were for the African continent. Notably, roughly 90 cents in every dollar of South Africas agricultural exports to the African continent is from the Southern Africa region. Grains, fruits, vegetables, and selected beverages are typically high on South Africas list of agriculture and food exports to the Southern Africa region. Not all countries rely equally on South Africas agriculture and food industry. There are just seven dominant countries, namely, Botswana, Namibia, Mozambique, Zimbabwe, Lesotho, Eswatini, and Zambia, which accounted for 81% of South Africas agricultural exports to the African continent in 2023. In fact, over the past five years, these countries have accounted, on average, for 80% of South Africas agricultural exports to the African continent a year. In the case of the staple grain of the Southern Africa region, maize, South Africa has remained a reliable supplier of it to the region even in times of drought crisis. Thus, it is vital that even in the challenging 2023-24, where South Africas maize harvest is down 22% from the previous year to 12,80 million tonnes, the exports continue. South Africa must remain a reliable supplier of food products to the region. This provides stability and ensures South Africas regional food security anchor position. Between May and mid-October 2024, South Africa exported about 1,03 million tonnes of maize. Except for those that went to Saudi Arabia, all these exports were for the Southern Africa region. There will likely be more exports in the coming week, as the export forecast for the season is 1,90 million tonnes. This is down notably from the 3,44 million tonnes of exports in the last season because of the poor harvest. The large maize carryover stock from the previous season has helped to boost South Africas maize supplies as an addition to the harvest. In some countries, in seasons like the one we are leaving behind, where the El-Nino-induced drought led to a poor harvest, there would be a temptation for an export curb. However, South Africa maintains an open market policy, where export activity continues, and the market adjusts prices guided by available information. The vital matter in South Africa is for the market players to regularly publish their export volumes through the Southern African Grain Information Services so that there is a general understanding of the available supplies and prices to adjust for potential risks. This open market approach has been practiced since the deregulation of agricultural markets in 1997. Since then, South Africas grain and broader agricultural markets have operated quite efficiently. Our sound history shows no need for intervention or grain reserves going forward. South Africas open market policy stance of allowing food trade to always take place even in years of production stress is important for food stability in region. Various other important exports include prepared or processed foods, wheat, apples and pears, maize meal, sugar, fruit juices, wine, and soybean oil, rice, soups, and sunflower oil, amongst other products. This strong linkage between South Africas agricultural exports to the Southern Africa region and the vast responsibility of regional food security led us to argue for caution whenever there is trade friction in various products between South Africa and the regional countries. Millions of people could be victims of high prices when countries restrict trade, as could be the case with the decisions by Botswana and Namibia to temporarily ban imports of high-quality South African vegetables. Equally, South Africas reaction could have a significant impact on the regions food security stability. Thus, the ideal path is always to address trade discomforts diplomatically, prioritize regional agriculture, and avoid friction. https://t.co/xMGeF3m8OA.

Wandile Sihlobo


Content

2024-11-12

South Africa must remain a reliable food supplier to Southern Africa South Africas agriculture and agribusiness sectors have a broader responsibility for food security beyond our borders. The Southern Africa region leans heavily on South Africa for food supplies. This is clear from the observation of South Africas agricultural exports. The country exported about US$13,2 billion of agricultural and processed food products in 2023, according to data from Trade Map. Nearly 40% of these exports were for the African continent. Notably, roughly 90 cents in every dollar of South Africas agricultural exports to the African continent is from the Southern Africa region. Grains, fruits, vegetables, and selected beverages are typically high on South Africas list of agriculture and food exports to the Southern Africa region. Not all countries rely equally on South Africas agriculture and food industry. There are just seven dominant countries, namely, Botswana, Namibia, Mozambique, Zimbabwe, Lesotho, Eswatini, and Zambia, which accounted for 81% of South Africas agricultural exports to the African continent in 2023. In fact, over the past five years, these countries have accounted, on average, for 80% of South Africas agricultural exports to the African continent a year. In the case of the staple grain of the Southern Africa region, maize, South Africa has remained a reliable supplier of it to the region even in times of drought crisis. Thus, it is vital that even in the challenging 2023-24, where South Africas maize harvest is down 22% from the previous year to 12,80 million tonnes, the exports continue. South Africa must remain a reliable supplier of food products to the region. This provides stability and ensures South Africas regional food security anchor position. Between May and mid-October 2024, South Africa exported about 1,03 million tonnes of maize. Except for those that went to Saudi Arabia, all these exports were for the Southern Africa region. There will likely be more exports in the coming week, as the export forecast for the season is 1,90 million tonnes. This is down notably from the 3,44 million tonnes of exports in the last season because of the poor harvest. The large maize carryover stock from the previous season has helped to boost South Africas maize supplies as an addition to the harvest. In some countries, in seasons like the one we are leaving behind, where the El-Nino-induced drought led to a poor harvest, there would be a temptation for an export curb. However, South Africa maintains an open market policy, where export activity continues, and the market adjusts prices guided by available information. The vital matter in South Africa is for the market players to regularly publish their export volumes through the Southern African Grain Information Services so that there is a general understanding of the available supplies and prices to adjust for potential risks. This open market approach has been practiced since the deregulation of agricultural markets in 1997. Since then, South Africas grain and broader agricultural markets have operated quite efficiently. Our sound history shows no need for intervention or grain reserves going forward. South Africas open market policy stance of allowing food trade to always take place even in years of production stress is important for food stability in region. Various other important exports include prepared or processed foods, wheat, apples and pears, maize meal, sugar, fruit juices, wine, and soybean oil, rice, soups, and sunflower oil, amongst other products. This strong linkage between South Africas agricultural exports to the Southern Africa region and the vast responsibility of regional food security led us to argue for caution whenever there is trade friction in various products between South Africa and the regional countries. Millions of people could be victims of high prices when countries restrict trade, as could be the case with the decisions by Botswana and Namibia to temporarily ban imports of high-quality South African vegetables. Equally, South Africas reaction could have a significant impact on the regions food security stability. Thus, the ideal path is always to address trade discomforts diplomatically, prioritize regional agriculture, and avoid friction. https://t.co/xMGeF3m8OA.

Wandile Sihlobo


Content

2024-11-12

South Africa must remain a reliable food supplier to Southern Africa South Africas agriculture and agribusiness sectors have a broader responsibility for food security beyond our borders. The Southern Africa region leans heavily on South Africa for food supplies. This is clear from the observation of South Africas agricultural exports. The country exported about US$13,2 billion of agricultural and processed food products in 2023, according to data from Trade Map. Nearly 40% of these exports were for the African continent. Notably, roughly 90 cents in every dollar of South Africas agricultural exports to the African continent is from the Southern Africa region. Grains, fruits, vegetables, and selected beverages are typically high on South Africas list of agriculture and food exports to the Southern Africa region. Not all countries rely equally on South Africas agriculture and food industry. There are just seven dominant countries, namely, Botswana, Namibia, Mozambique, Zimbabwe, Lesotho, Eswatini, and Zambia, which accounted for 81% of South Africas agricultural exports to the African continent in 2023. In fact, over the past five years, these countries have accounted, on average, for 80% of South Africas agricultural exports to the African continent a year. In the case of the staple grain of the Southern Africa region, maize, South Africa has remained a reliable supplier of it to the region even in times of drought crisis. Thus, it is vital that even in the challenging 2023-24, where South Africas maize harvest is down 22% from the previous year to 12,80 million tonnes, the exports continue. South Africa must remain a reliable supplier of food products to the region. This provides stability and ensures South Africas regional food security anchor position. Between May and mid-October 2024, South Africa exported about 1,03 million tonnes of maize. Except for those that went to Saudi Arabia, all these exports were for the Southern Africa region. There will likely be more exports in the coming week, as the export forecast for the season is 1,90 million tonnes. This is down notably from the 3,44 million tonnes of exports in the last season because of the poor harvest. The large maize carryover stock from the previous season has helped to boost South Africas maize supplies as an addition to the harvest. In some countries, in seasons like the one we are leaving behind, where the El-Nino-induced drought led to a poor harvest, there would be a temptation for an export curb. However, South Africa maintains an open market policy, where export activity continues, and the market adjusts prices guided by available information. The vital matter in South Africa is for the market players to regularly publish their export volumes through the Southern African Grain Information Services so that there is a general understanding of the available supplies and prices to adjust for potential risks. This open market approach has been practiced since the deregulation of agricultural markets in 1997. Since then, South Africas grain and broader agricultural markets have operated quite efficiently. Our sound history shows no need for intervention or grain reserves going forward. South Africas open market policy stance of allowing food trade to always take place even in years of production stress is important for food stability in region. Various other important exports include prepared or processed foods, wheat, apples and pears, maize meal, sugar, fruit juices, wine, and soybean oil, rice, soups, and sunflower oil, amongst other products. This strong linkage between South Africas agricultural exports to the Southern Africa region and the vast responsibility of regional food security led us to argue for caution whenever there is trade friction in various products between South Africa and the regional countries. Millions of people could be victims of high prices when countries restrict trade, as could be the case with the decisions by Botswana and Namibia to temporarily ban imports of high-quality South African vegetables. Equally, South Africas reaction could have a significant impact on the regions food security stability. Thus, the ideal path is always to address trade discomforts diplomatically, prioritize regional agriculture, and avoid friction. https://t.co/xMGeF3m8OA.

Wandile Sihlobo


Content

2024-11-12

South Africa must remain a reliable food supplier to Southern Africa South Africas agriculture and agribusiness sectors have a broader responsibility for food security beyond our borders. The Southern Africa region leans heavily on South Africa for food supplies. This is clear from the observation of South Africas agricultural exports. The country exported about US$13,2 billion of agricultural and processed food products in 2023, according to data from Trade Map. Nearly 40% of these exports were for the African continent. Notably, roughly 90 cents in every dollar of South Africas agricultural exports to the African continent is from the Southern Africa region. Grains, fruits, vegetables, and selected beverages are typically high on South Africas list of agriculture and food exports to the Southern Africa region. Not all countries rely equally on South Africas agriculture and food industry. There are just seven dominant countries, namely, Botswana, Namibia, Mozambique, Zimbabwe, Lesotho, Eswatini, and Zambia, which accounted for 81% of South Africas agricultural exports to the African continent in 2023. In fact, over the past five years, these countries have accounted, on average, for 80% of South Africas agricultural exports to the African continent a year. In the case of the staple grain of the Southern Africa region, maize, South Africa has remained a reliable supplier of it to the region even in times of drought crisis. Thus, it is vital that even in the challenging 2023-24, where South Africas maize harvest is down 22% from the previous year to 12,80 million tonnes, the exports continue. South Africa must remain a reliable supplier of food products to the region. This provides stability and ensures South Africas regional food security anchor position. Between May and mid-October 2024, South Africa exported about 1,03 million tonnes of maize. Except for those that went to Saudi Arabia, all these exports were for the Southern Africa region. There will likely be more exports in the coming week, as the export forecast for the season is 1,90 million tonnes. This is down notably from the 3,44 million tonnes of exports in the last season because of the poor harvest. The large maize carryover stock from the previous season has helped to boost South Africas maize supplies as an addition to the harvest. In some countries, in seasons like the one we are leaving behind, where the El-Nino-induced drought led to a poor harvest, there would be a temptation for an export curb. However, South Africa maintains an open market policy, where export activity continues, and the market adjusts prices guided by available information. The vital matter in South Africa is for the market players to regularly publish their export volumes through the Southern African Grain Information Services so that there is a general understanding of the available supplies and prices to adjust for potential risks. This open market approach has been practiced since the deregulation of agricultural markets in 1997. Since then, South Africas grain and broader agricultural markets have operated quite efficiently. Our sound history shows no need for intervention or grain reserves going forward. South Africas open market policy stance of allowing food trade to always take place even in years of production stress is important for food stability in region. Various other important exports include prepared or processed foods, wheat, apples and pears, maize meal, sugar, fruit juices, wine, and soybean oil, rice, soups, and sunflower oil, amongst other products. This strong linkage between South Africas agricultural exports to the Southern Africa region and the vast responsibility of regional food security led us to argue for caution whenever there is trade friction in various products between South Africa and the regional countries. Millions of people could be victims of high prices when countries restrict trade, as could be the case with the decisions by Botswana and Namibia to temporarily ban imports of high-quality South African vegetables. Equally, South Africas reaction could have a significant impact on the regions food security stability. Thus, the ideal path is always to address trade discomforts diplomatically, prioritize regional agriculture, and avoid friction. https://t.co/xMGeF3m8OA.

Maja Wallengren


Content

2024-11-12

As also mentioned by @F4tailhook and - sorry to see our friend @Judy_Ganes is back to AGAIN blatantly and outright LYING in the sad attempt to please her two main pro-bear manipulaters Rabobank and ECOM - but of course as @moyfarm says there is HUGE interest from multinationals to buy new 2024 Brazil crop top continue the MASSIVE manipulation of ICE certified stocks and try to to give completely FAKE impression or ICE stocks rising at a time the Jan-Sep alleged "record exports" from Brazil revealed GIGANTIC disappearance of close to 10M bags with only 400K going into new stocks in CONFIRMED reports from EFC, so NO, of course; 1-There is ZERO increase in "new"stocks at ICE or anywhere else, 2-Actual ICE certified are COMPLETELY irrelevant as these stocks are ALREADY included in EFC and other official #KC stocks reports from importing ports so whatever figure MAY be a TAD higher in ICE is compensated DOWNWARD in ALL other stocks reports, 3-No as also reported by Moy here and EVERY single other #coffee grower across Brazil there is just not ANY significant level of coffee available for buying as, 4-New crop is way OVER-SOLD and exporters and brokers are already struggling to try to deliver what they have promised and, 5-That is going to get VERY expensive for them but good for growers to at least get tiny compensation this way for crop volumes cut dramatically lower by weather disasters in 80-90% of ALL world coffee producing areas, 6-And as ALSO said by @MEM64530898 of course the LITTLE coffee available from Brazil is simply NOT even close to par for certification standards at ICE so it will be yet another ICE cold shower to the pro-bear camp, because. 7-No there is still ZERO even report possibility for ANY meaningful recovery to the coffee supply chain WORLD WIDE incl Brazil until 2027-2028 earliest!! Game over #KC !! My latest #KC and #coffee analysis on Brazil now OUT in @GCRmag and coming up in FULL later TODAY !! https://t.co/LBh2edwKPb https://t.co/3DTarHmahc https://t.co/kSk9zq2xHd.

Maja Wallengren


Content

2024-11-12

As also mentioned by @F4tailhook and - sorry to see our friend @Judy_Ganes is back to AGAIN blatantly and outright LYING in the sad attempt to please her two main pro-bear manipulaters Rabobank and ECOM - but of course as @moyfarm says there is HUGE interest from multinationals to buy new 2024 Brazil crop top continue the MASSIVE manipulation of ICE certified stocks and try to to give completely FAKE impression or ICE stocks rising at a time the Jan-Sep alleged "record exports" from Brazil revealed GIGANTIC disappearance of close to 10M bags with only 400K going into new stocks in CONFIRMED reports from EFC, so NO, of course; 1-There is ZERO increase in "new"stocks at ICE or anywhere else, 2-Actual ICE certified are COMPLETELY irrelevant as these stocks are ALREADY included in EFC and other official #KC stocks reports from importing ports so whatever figure MAY be a TAD higher in ICE is compensated DOWNWARD in ALL other stocks reports, 3-No as also reported by Moy here and EVERY single other #coffee grower across Brazil there is just not ANY significant level of coffee available for buying as, 4-New crop is way OVER-SOLD and exporters and brokers are already struggling to try to deliver what they have promised and, 5-That is going to get VERY expensive for them but good for growers to at least get tiny compensation this way for crop volumes cut dramatically lower by weather disasters in 80-90% of ALL world coffee producing areas, 6-And as ALSO said by @MEM64530898 of course the LITTLE coffee available from Brazil is simply NOT even close to par for certification standards at ICE so it will be yet another ICE cold shower to the pro-bear camp, because. 7-No there is still ZERO even report possibility for ANY meaningful recovery to the coffee supply chain WORLD WIDE incl Brazil until 2027-2028 earliest!! Game over #KC !! My latest #KC and #coffee analysis on Brazil now OUT in @GCRmag and coming up in FULL later TODAY !! https://t.co/LBh2edwKPb https://t.co/3DTarHmahc https://t.co/kSk9zq2xHd.

Maja Wallengren


Content

2024-11-12

As also mentioned by @F4tailhook and - sorry to see our friend @Judy_Ganes is back to AGAIN blatantly and outright LYING in the sad attempt to please her two main pro-bear manipulaters Rabobank and ECOM - but of course as @moyfarm says there is HUGE interest from multinationals to buy new 2024 Brazil crop top continue the MASSIVE manipulation of ICE certified stocks and try to to give completely FAKE impression or ICE stocks rising at a time the Jan-Sep alleged "record exports" from Brazil revealed GIGANTIC disappearance of close to 10M bags with only 400K going into new stocks in CONFIRMED reports from EFC, so NO, of course; 1-There is ZERO increase in "new"stocks at ICE or anywhere else, 2-Actual ICE certified are COMPLETELY irrelevant as these stocks are ALREADY included in EFC and other official #KC stocks reports from importing ports so whatever figure MAY be a TAD higher in ICE is compensated DOWNWARD in ALL other stocks reports, 3-No as also reported by Moy here and EVERY single other #coffee grower across Brazil there is just not ANY significant level of coffee available for buying as, 4-New crop is way OVER-SOLD and exporters and brokers are already struggling to try to deliver what they have promised and, 5-That is going to get VERY expensive for them but good for growers to at least get tiny compensation this way for crop volumes cut dramatically lower by weather disasters in 80-90% of ALL world coffee producing areas, 6-And as ALSO said by @MEM64530898 of course the LITTLE coffee available from Brazil is simply NOT even close to par for certification standards at ICE so it will be yet another ICE cold shower to the pro-bear camp, because. 7-No there is still ZERO even report possibility for ANY meaningful recovery to the coffee supply chain WORLD WIDE incl Brazil until 2027-2028 earliest!! Game over #KC !! My latest #KC and #coffee analysis on Brazil now OUT in @GCRmag and coming up in FULL later TODAY !! https://t.co/LBh2edwKPb https://t.co/3DTarHmahc https://t.co/kSk9zq2xHd.

Maja Wallengren


Content

2024-11-12

As also mentioned by @F4tailhook and - sorry to see our friend @Judy_Ganes is back to AGAIN blatantly and outright LYING in the sad attempt to please her two main pro-bear manipulaters Rabobank and ECOM - but of course as @moyfarm says there is HUGE interest from multinationals to buy new 2024 Brazil crop top continue the MASSIVE manipulation of ICE certified stocks and try to to give completely FAKE impression or ICE stocks rising at a time the Jan-Sep alleged "record exports" from Brazil revealed GIGANTIC disappearance of close to 10M bags with only 400K going into new stocks in CONFIRMED reports from EFC, so NO, of course; 1-There is ZERO increase in "new"stocks at ICE or anywhere else, 2-Actual ICE certified are COMPLETELY irrelevant as these stocks are ALREADY included in EFC and other official #KC stocks reports from importing ports so whatever figure MAY be a TAD higher in ICE is compensated DOWNWARD in ALL other stocks reports, 3-No as also reported by Moy here and EVERY single other #coffee grower across Brazil there is just not ANY significant level of coffee available for buying as, 4-New crop is way OVER-SOLD and exporters and brokers are already struggling to try to deliver what they have promised and, 5-That is going to get VERY expensive for them but good for growers to at least get tiny compensation this way for crop volumes cut dramatically lower by weather disasters in 80-90% of ALL world coffee producing areas, 6-And as ALSO said by @MEM64530898 of course the LITTLE coffee available from Brazil is simply NOT even close to par for certification standards at ICE so it will be yet another ICE cold shower to the pro-bear camp, because. 7-No there is still ZERO even report possibility for ANY meaningful recovery to the coffee supply chain WORLD WIDE incl Brazil until 2027-2028 earliest!! Game over #KC !! My latest #KC and #coffee analysis on Brazil now OUT in @GCRmag and coming up in FULL later TODAY !! https://t.co/LBh2edwKPb https://t.co/3DTarHmahc https://t.co/kSk9zq2xHd.

Countries


Content

2024-11-12

Trumps Return Could Shift Dynamics for Russias Sanctioned Arctic LNG 2 Project A second #Trump administration may impact Russias Arctic LNG 2 project, which has struggled under Western sanctions. Ana Subasic, Market Analyst for #LNG and Natural Gas at Kpler Insight, noted, Though it is too soon to say for certain, Arctic LNG 2's future will likely become entwined with the shifting dynamics of US-Russia relations under a second Trump administration. Trump has previously shown openness to solutions vastly different from current approaches, including territorial concessions in the Ukraine to resolve the ongoing war efforts. Kremlin remains cautious, however. Lets not forget that we are talking about an unfriendly country that is directly and indirectly involved in a war against our state, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said. Sanctions from the US, EU, and UK restrict Arctic LNG 2s operations and export capacity, but Subasic suggests that a Republican-led Department of State could take a restrained approach: Given the unpredictability of Trumps narrative, it is not improbable that sanctions could loosen to a degree in an attempt to re-establish relations or they wont continue to ramp up. Kpler data shows #Russia discreetly lifted eight LNG cargoes from Arctic LNG 2, amounting to 0.46 million tonnes. However, these remain unsold due to the constraints of current sanctions. Stay ahead of the market with Kpler Insight: https://t.co/EPhnT1G6y6 https://t.co/ASUitueIRN https://t.co/EmJ7n29nA7.


Content

2024-11-12

Trumps Return Could Shift Dynamics for Russias Sanctioned Arctic LNG 2 Project A second #Trump administration may impact Russias Arctic LNG 2 project, which has struggled under Western sanctions. Ana Subasic, Market Analyst for #LNG and Natural Gas at Kpler Insight, noted, Though it is too soon to say for certain, Arctic LNG 2's future will likely become entwined with the shifting dynamics of US-Russia relations under a second Trump administration. Trump has previously shown openness to solutions vastly different from current approaches, including territorial concessions in the Ukraine to resolve the ongoing war efforts. Kremlin remains cautious, however. Lets not forget that we are talking about an unfriendly country that is directly and indirectly involved in a war against our state, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said. Sanctions from the US, EU, and UK restrict Arctic LNG 2s operations and export capacity, but Subasic suggests that a Republican-led Department of State could take a restrained approach: Given the unpredictability of Trumps narrative, it is not improbable that sanctions could loosen to a degree in an attempt to re-establish relations or they wont continue to ramp up. Kpler data shows #Russia discreetly lifted eight LNG cargoes from Arctic LNG 2, amounting to 0.46 million tonnes. However, these remain unsold due to the constraints of current sanctions. Stay ahead of the market with Kpler Insight: https://t.co/EPhnT1G6y6 https://t.co/ASUitueIRN https://t.co/EmJ7n29nA7.


Content

2024-11-12

Trumps Return Could Shift Dynamics for Russias Sanctioned Arctic LNG 2 Project A second #Trump administration may impact Russias Arctic LNG 2 project, which has struggled under Western sanctions. Ana Subasic, Market Analyst for #LNG and Natural Gas at Kpler Insight, noted, Though it is too soon to say for certain, Arctic LNG 2's future will likely become entwined with the shifting dynamics of US-Russia relations under a second Trump administration. Trump has previously shown openness to solutions vastly different from current approaches, including territorial concessions in the Ukraine to resolve the ongoing war efforts. Kremlin remains cautious, however. Lets not forget that we are talking about an unfriendly country that is directly and indirectly involved in a war against our state, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said. Sanctions from the US, EU, and UK restrict Arctic LNG 2s operations and export capacity, but Subasic suggests that a Republican-led Department of State could take a restrained approach: Given the unpredictability of Trumps narrative, it is not improbable that sanctions could loosen to a degree in an attempt to re-establish relations or they wont continue to ramp up. Kpler data shows #Russia discreetly lifted eight LNG cargoes from Arctic LNG 2, amounting to 0.46 million tonnes. However, these remain unsold due to the constraints of current sanctions. Stay ahead of the market with Kpler Insight: https://t.co/EPhnT1G6y6 https://t.co/ASUitueIRN https://t.co/EmJ7n29nA7.


Content

2024-11-12

Trumps Return Could Shift Dynamics for Russias Sanctioned Arctic LNG 2 Project A second #Trump administration may impact Russias Arctic LNG 2 project, which has struggled under Western sanctions. Ana Subasic, Market Analyst for #LNG and Natural Gas at Kpler Insight, noted, Though it is too soon to say for certain, Arctic LNG 2's future will likely become entwined with the shifting dynamics of US-Russia relations under a second Trump administration. Trump has previously shown openness to solutions vastly different from current approaches, including territorial concessions in the Ukraine to resolve the ongoing war efforts. Kremlin remains cautious, however. Lets not forget that we are talking about an unfriendly country that is directly and indirectly involved in a war against our state, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said. Sanctions from the US, EU, and UK restrict Arctic LNG 2s operations and export capacity, but Subasic suggests that a Republican-led Department of State could take a restrained approach: Given the unpredictability of Trumps narrative, it is not improbable that sanctions could loosen to a degree in an attempt to re-establish relations or they wont continue to ramp up. Kpler data shows #Russia discreetly lifted eight LNG cargoes from Arctic LNG 2, amounting to 0.46 million tonnes. However, these remain unsold due to the constraints of current sanctions. Stay ahead of the market with Kpler Insight: https://t.co/EPhnT1G6y6 https://t.co/ASUitueIRN https://t.co/EmJ7n29nA7.


Content

2024-11-12

I've said this 1000 times and I'll say it 1000 more Corn production is ESSENTIAL to National Security and the soverignty of this nation. Without a robust corn crop, people will famine. It MUST be subsidized Why? the three F's Fuel Feed Food Fuel. Ethanol. The good stuff that makes Supra's go fast. Yeah, we subsidize it's production through the RFS and RIN's(subtweet), but it's truly a renewable resource. It has a relatively low carbon intensity, provides wonderful and stable jobs Feed: Cattle, pigs, chickens, goats, horses, ducks all eat corn. Equally importantly, DDG's is a staple ingredient in many feed rations. That is the non fuel byproduct of producing corn ethanol, for anyone reading that doesn't know. It's a high protein medium fat product that is used to fill out animal feed rations Food-it's small, but we do consume something like 5% of the corn produced as actual food(fact check my percentage if you want) Could we stop subsidizing corn and maybe be okay? Sure. We will also collapse the farm economy and a massive percentage of rural communities that exclusivly rely on agriculture jobs and revenue as their lifeblood. Is that a chance I'm willing to take? Hard no "michael shouldn't we subsidize and prioritize american produce instead of letting cheap Mexican and South American produce come in??" Yes, but not at the expense of corn. Let's divert some of that Israel/Ukraine money to lettuce and cucumbers in Florida https://t.co/QpptPgyEtI https://t.co/Z9r0YUXssb.


Content

2024-11-12

I've said this 1000 times and I'll say it 1000 more Corn production is ESSENTIAL to National Security and the soverignty of this nation. Without a robust corn crop, people will famine. It MUST be subsidized Why? the three F's Fuel Feed Food Fuel. Ethanol. The good stuff that makes Supra's go fast. Yeah, we subsidize it's production through the RFS and RIN's(subtweet), but it's truly a renewable resource. It has a relatively low carbon intensity, provides wonderful and stable jobs Feed: Cattle, pigs, chickens, goats, horses, ducks all eat corn. Equally importantly, DDG's is a staple ingredient in many feed rations. That is the non fuel byproduct of producing corn ethanol, for anyone reading that doesn't know. It's a high protein medium fat product that is used to fill out animal feed rations Food-it's small, but we do consume something like 5% of the corn produced as actual food(fact check my percentage if you want) Could we stop subsidizing corn and maybe be okay? Sure. We will also collapse the farm economy and a massive percentage of rural communities that exclusivly rely on agriculture jobs and revenue as their lifeblood. Is that a chance I'm willing to take? Hard no "michael shouldn't we subsidize and prioritize american produce instead of letting cheap Mexican and South American produce come in??" Yes, but not at the expense of corn. Let's divert some of that Israel/Ukraine money to lettuce and cucumbers in Florida https://t.co/QpptPgyEtI https://t.co/Z9r0YUXssb.


Content

2024-11-12

I've said this 1000 times and I'll say it 1000 more Corn production is ESSENTIAL to National Security and the soverignty of this nation. Without a robust corn crop, people will famine. It MUST be subsidized Why? the three F's Fuel Feed Food Fuel. Ethanol. The good stuff that makes Supra's go fast. Yeah, we subsidize it's production through the RFS and RIN's(subtweet), but it's truly a renewable resource. It has a relatively low carbon intensity, provides wonderful and stable jobs Feed: Cattle, pigs, chickens, goats, horses, ducks all eat corn. Equally importantly, DDG's is a staple ingredient in many feed rations. That is the non fuel byproduct of producing corn ethanol, for anyone reading that doesn't know. It's a high protein medium fat product that is used to fill out animal feed rations Food-it's small, but we do consume something like 5% of the corn produced as actual food(fact check my percentage if you want) Could we stop subsidizing corn and maybe be okay? Sure. We will also collapse the farm economy and a massive percentage of rural communities that exclusivly rely on agriculture jobs and revenue as their lifeblood. Is that a chance I'm willing to take? Hard no "michael shouldn't we subsidize and prioritize american produce instead of letting cheap Mexican and South American produce come in??" Yes, but not at the expense of corn. Let's divert some of that Israel/Ukraine money to lettuce and cucumbers in Florida https://t.co/QpptPgyEtI https://t.co/Z9r0YUXssb.


Content

2024-11-12

I've said this 1000 times and I'll say it 1000 more Corn production is ESSENTIAL to National Security and the soverignty of this nation. Without a robust corn crop, people will famine. It MUST be subsidized Why? the three F's Fuel Feed Food Fuel. Ethanol. The good stuff that makes Supra's go fast. Yeah, we subsidize it's production through the RFS and RIN's(subtweet), but it's truly a renewable resource. It has a relatively low carbon intensity, provides wonderful and stable jobs Feed: Cattle, pigs, chickens, goats, horses, ducks all eat corn. Equally importantly, DDG's is a staple ingredient in many feed rations. That is the non fuel byproduct of producing corn ethanol, for anyone reading that doesn't know. It's a high protein medium fat product that is used to fill out animal feed rations Food-it's small, but we do consume something like 5% of the corn produced as actual food(fact check my percentage if you want) Could we stop subsidizing corn and maybe be okay? Sure. We will also collapse the farm economy and a massive percentage of rural communities that exclusivly rely on agriculture jobs and revenue as their lifeblood. Is that a chance I'm willing to take? Hard no "michael shouldn't we subsidize and prioritize american produce instead of letting cheap Mexican and South American produce come in??" Yes, but not at the expense of corn. Let's divert some of that Israel/Ukraine money to lettuce and cucumbers in Florida https://t.co/QpptPgyEtI https://t.co/Z9r0YUXssb.

Narratives
Thought Leadership


Content

2024-11-12

South Africa must remain a reliable food supplier to Southern Africa South Africas agriculture and agribusiness sectors have a broader responsibility for food security beyond our borders. The Southern Africa region leans heavily on South Africa for food supplies. This is clear from the observation of South Africas agricultural exports. The country exported about US$13,2 billion of agricultural and processed food products in 2023, according to data from Trade Map. Nearly 40% of these exports were for the African continent. Notably, roughly 90 cents in every dollar of South Africas agricultural exports to the African continent is from the Southern Africa region. Grains, fruits, vegetables, and selected beverages are typically high on South Africas list of agriculture and food exports to the Southern Africa region. Not all countries rely equally on South Africas agriculture and food industry. There are just seven dominant countries, namely, Botswana, Namibia, Mozambique, Zimbabwe, Lesotho, Eswatini, and Zambia, which accounted for 81% of South Africas agricultural exports to the African continent in 2023. In fact, over the past five years, these countries have accounted, on average, for 80% of South Africas agricultural exports to the African continent a year. In the case of the staple grain of the Southern Africa region, maize, South Africa has remained a reliable supplier of it to the region even in times of drought crisis. Thus, it is vital that even in the challenging 2023-24, where South Africas maize harvest is down 22% from the previous year to 12,80 million tonnes, the exports continue. South Africa must remain a reliable supplier of food products to the region. This provides stability and ensures South Africas regional food security anchor position. Between May and mid-October 2024, South Africa exported about 1,03 million tonnes of maize. Except for those that went to Saudi Arabia, all these exports were for the Southern Africa region. There will likely be more exports in the coming week, as the export forecast for the season is 1,90 million tonnes. This is down notably from the 3,44 million tonnes of exports in the last season because of the poor harvest. The large maize carryover stock from the previous season has helped to boost South Africas maize supplies as an addition to the harvest. In some countries, in seasons like the one we are leaving behind, where the El-Nino-induced drought led to a poor harvest, there would be a temptation for an export curb. However, South Africa maintains an open market policy, where export activity continues, and the market adjusts prices guided by available information. The vital matter in South Africa is for the market players to regularly publish their export volumes through the Southern African Grain Information Services so that there is a general understanding of the available supplies and prices to adjust for potential risks. This open market approach has been practiced since the deregulation of agricultural markets in 1997. Since then, South Africas grain and broader agricultural markets have operated quite efficiently. Our sound history shows no need for intervention or grain reserves going forward. South Africas open market policy stance of allowing food trade to always take place even in years of production stress is important for food stability in region. Various other important exports include prepared or processed foods, wheat, apples and pears, maize meal, sugar, fruit juices, wine, and soybean oil, rice, soups, and sunflower oil, amongst other products. This strong linkage between South Africas agricultural exports to the Southern Africa region and the vast responsibility of regional food security led us to argue for caution whenever there is trade friction in various products between South Africa and the regional countries. Millions of people could be victims of high prices when countries restrict trade, as could be the case with the decisions by Botswana and Namibia to temporarily ban imports of high-quality South African vegetables. Equally, South Africas reaction could have a significant impact on the regions food security stability. Thus, the ideal path is always to address trade discomforts diplomatically, prioritize regional agriculture, and avoid friction. https://t.co/xMGeF3m8OA.


Content

2024-11-12

South Africa must remain a reliable food supplier to Southern Africa South Africas agriculture and agribusiness sectors have a broader responsibility for food security beyond our borders. The Southern Africa region leans heavily on South Africa for food supplies. This is clear from the observation of South Africas agricultural exports. The country exported about US$13,2 billion of agricultural and processed food products in 2023, according to data from Trade Map. Nearly 40% of these exports were for the African continent. Notably, roughly 90 cents in every dollar of South Africas agricultural exports to the African continent is from the Southern Africa region. Grains, fruits, vegetables, and selected beverages are typically high on South Africas list of agriculture and food exports to the Southern Africa region. Not all countries rely equally on South Africas agriculture and food industry. There are just seven dominant countries, namely, Botswana, Namibia, Mozambique, Zimbabwe, Lesotho, Eswatini, and Zambia, which accounted for 81% of South Africas agricultural exports to the African continent in 2023. In fact, over the past five years, these countries have accounted, on average, for 80% of South Africas agricultural exports to the African continent a year. In the case of the staple grain of the Southern Africa region, maize, South Africa has remained a reliable supplier of it to the region even in times of drought crisis. Thus, it is vital that even in the challenging 2023-24, where South Africas maize harvest is down 22% from the previous year to 12,80 million tonnes, the exports continue. South Africa must remain a reliable supplier of food products to the region. This provides stability and ensures South Africas regional food security anchor position. Between May and mid-October 2024, South Africa exported about 1,03 million tonnes of maize. Except for those that went to Saudi Arabia, all these exports were for the Southern Africa region. There will likely be more exports in the coming week, as the export forecast for the season is 1,90 million tonnes. This is down notably from the 3,44 million tonnes of exports in the last season because of the poor harvest. The large maize carryover stock from the previous season has helped to boost South Africas maize supplies as an addition to the harvest. In some countries, in seasons like the one we are leaving behind, where the El-Nino-induced drought led to a poor harvest, there would be a temptation for an export curb. However, South Africa maintains an open market policy, where export activity continues, and the market adjusts prices guided by available information. The vital matter in South Africa is for the market players to regularly publish their export volumes through the Southern African Grain Information Services so that there is a general understanding of the available supplies and prices to adjust for potential risks. This open market approach has been practiced since the deregulation of agricultural markets in 1997. Since then, South Africas grain and broader agricultural markets have operated quite efficiently. Our sound history shows no need for intervention or grain reserves going forward. South Africas open market policy stance of allowing food trade to always take place even in years of production stress is important for food stability in region. Various other important exports include prepared or processed foods, wheat, apples and pears, maize meal, sugar, fruit juices, wine, and soybean oil, rice, soups, and sunflower oil, amongst other products. This strong linkage between South Africas agricultural exports to the Southern Africa region and the vast responsibility of regional food security led us to argue for caution whenever there is trade friction in various products between South Africa and the regional countries. Millions of people could be victims of high prices when countries restrict trade, as could be the case with the decisions by Botswana and Namibia to temporarily ban imports of high-quality South African vegetables. Equally, South Africas reaction could have a significant impact on the regions food security stability. Thus, the ideal path is always to address trade discomforts diplomatically, prioritize regional agriculture, and avoid friction. https://t.co/xMGeF3m8OA.


Content

2024-11-12

South Africa must remain a reliable food supplier to Southern Africa South Africas agriculture and agribusiness sectors have a broader responsibility for food security beyond our borders. The Southern Africa region leans heavily on South Africa for food supplies. This is clear from the observation of South Africas agricultural exports. The country exported about US$13,2 billion of agricultural and processed food products in 2023, according to data from Trade Map. Nearly 40% of these exports were for the African continent. Notably, roughly 90 cents in every dollar of South Africas agricultural exports to the African continent is from the Southern Africa region. Grains, fruits, vegetables, and selected beverages are typically high on South Africas list of agriculture and food exports to the Southern Africa region. Not all countries rely equally on South Africas agriculture and food industry. There are just seven dominant countries, namely, Botswana, Namibia, Mozambique, Zimbabwe, Lesotho, Eswatini, and Zambia, which accounted for 81% of South Africas agricultural exports to the African continent in 2023. In fact, over the past five years, these countries have accounted, on average, for 80% of South Africas agricultural exports to the African continent a year. In the case of the staple grain of the Southern Africa region, maize, South Africa has remained a reliable supplier of it to the region even in times of drought crisis. Thus, it is vital that even in the challenging 2023-24, where South Africas maize harvest is down 22% from the previous year to 12,80 million tonnes, the exports continue. South Africa must remain a reliable supplier of food products to the region. This provides stability and ensures South Africas regional food security anchor position. Between May and mid-October 2024, South Africa exported about 1,03 million tonnes of maize. Except for those that went to Saudi Arabia, all these exports were for the Southern Africa region. There will likely be more exports in the coming week, as the export forecast for the season is 1,90 million tonnes. This is down notably from the 3,44 million tonnes of exports in the last season because of the poor harvest. The large maize carryover stock from the previous season has helped to boost South Africas maize supplies as an addition to the harvest. In some countries, in seasons like the one we are leaving behind, where the El-Nino-induced drought led to a poor harvest, there would be a temptation for an export curb. However, South Africa maintains an open market policy, where export activity continues, and the market adjusts prices guided by available information. The vital matter in South Africa is for the market players to regularly publish their export volumes through the Southern African Grain Information Services so that there is a general understanding of the available supplies and prices to adjust for potential risks. This open market approach has been practiced since the deregulation of agricultural markets in 1997. Since then, South Africas grain and broader agricultural markets have operated quite efficiently. Our sound history shows no need for intervention or grain reserves going forward. South Africas open market policy stance of allowing food trade to always take place even in years of production stress is important for food stability in region. Various other important exports include prepared or processed foods, wheat, apples and pears, maize meal, sugar, fruit juices, wine, and soybean oil, rice, soups, and sunflower oil, amongst other products. This strong linkage between South Africas agricultural exports to the Southern Africa region and the vast responsibility of regional food security led us to argue for caution whenever there is trade friction in various products between South Africa and the regional countries. Millions of people could be victims of high prices when countries restrict trade, as could be the case with the decisions by Botswana and Namibia to temporarily ban imports of high-quality South African vegetables. Equally, South Africas reaction could have a significant impact on the regions food security stability. Thus, the ideal path is always to address trade discomforts diplomatically, prioritize regional agriculture, and avoid friction. https://t.co/xMGeF3m8OA.


Content

2024-11-12

South Africa must remain a reliable food supplier to Southern Africa South Africas agriculture and agribusiness sectors have a broader responsibility for food security beyond our borders. The Southern Africa region leans heavily on South Africa for food supplies. This is clear from the observation of South Africas agricultural exports. The country exported about US$13,2 billion of agricultural and processed food products in 2023, according to data from Trade Map. Nearly 40% of these exports were for the African continent. Notably, roughly 90 cents in every dollar of South Africas agricultural exports to the African continent is from the Southern Africa region. Grains, fruits, vegetables, and selected beverages are typically high on South Africas list of agriculture and food exports to the Southern Africa region. Not all countries rely equally on South Africas agriculture and food industry. There are just seven dominant countries, namely, Botswana, Namibia, Mozambique, Zimbabwe, Lesotho, Eswatini, and Zambia, which accounted for 81% of South Africas agricultural exports to the African continent in 2023. In fact, over the past five years, these countries have accounted, on average, for 80% of South Africas agricultural exports to the African continent a year. In the case of the staple grain of the Southern Africa region, maize, South Africa has remained a reliable supplier of it to the region even in times of drought crisis. Thus, it is vital that even in the challenging 2023-24, where South Africas maize harvest is down 22% from the previous year to 12,80 million tonnes, the exports continue. South Africa must remain a reliable supplier of food products to the region. This provides stability and ensures South Africas regional food security anchor position. Between May and mid-October 2024, South Africa exported about 1,03 million tonnes of maize. Except for those that went to Saudi Arabia, all these exports were for the Southern Africa region. There will likely be more exports in the coming week, as the export forecast for the season is 1,90 million tonnes. This is down notably from the 3,44 million tonnes of exports in the last season because of the poor harvest. The large maize carryover stock from the previous season has helped to boost South Africas maize supplies as an addition to the harvest. In some countries, in seasons like the one we are leaving behind, where the El-Nino-induced drought led to a poor harvest, there would be a temptation for an export curb. However, South Africa maintains an open market policy, where export activity continues, and the market adjusts prices guided by available information. The vital matter in South Africa is for the market players to regularly publish their export volumes through the Southern African Grain Information Services so that there is a general understanding of the available supplies and prices to adjust for potential risks. This open market approach has been practiced since the deregulation of agricultural markets in 1997. Since then, South Africas grain and broader agricultural markets have operated quite efficiently. Our sound history shows no need for intervention or grain reserves going forward. South Africas open market policy stance of allowing food trade to always take place even in years of production stress is important for food stability in region. Various other important exports include prepared or processed foods, wheat, apples and pears, maize meal, sugar, fruit juices, wine, and soybean oil, rice, soups, and sunflower oil, amongst other products. This strong linkage between South Africas agricultural exports to the Southern Africa region and the vast responsibility of regional food security led us to argue for caution whenever there is trade friction in various products between South Africa and the regional countries. Millions of people could be victims of high prices when countries restrict trade, as could be the case with the decisions by Botswana and Namibia to temporarily ban imports of high-quality South African vegetables. Equally, South Africas reaction could have a significant impact on the regions food security stability. Thus, the ideal path is always to address trade discomforts diplomatically, prioritize regional agriculture, and avoid friction. https://t.co/xMGeF3m8OA.


Content

2024-11-12

Fed cut ST rates by 50bps so 10y soars higher by 80bps? Did the bond market completely change its mind about the Fed, the economy and inflation? No. This is just curve steepening and we see this in every cycle - even +80bps selloffs in 10y. Not unusual at all. 1. Lost in the focus on the 10s, there appears to be two different yield curves. LT and MT yields are rising fast, but the front end is doing the opposite. There's your first hint. Lower rates at the front, bull steepening. 2. This steepening often occurs during recessionary periods and this part of it reflects different responses from various sections of the yield curve to economic uncertainty and market developments. After the huge rally through summer, retracement is normal and expected. 3. What's happening now is an almost exact replay of the first couple months of the dot-com recession, uncanny parallels. Rates (ST & LT) fell while payrolls were still positive then the recession start, payrolls turned negative and LT rates soared; 10y yield increased by more than 80bps (sound familiar?) 4. Market uncertainty plays a critical role in shaping the behavior of interest rates, particularly at the long end of the yield curve. This uncertainty leads to divergence in movements between the front end and the back. In the front, uncertainty is diminishing - rate cuts are coming. At the back end, uncertainty is rising after the previous rally. 5. Overall economic indicators suggest that the economy is approaching a recession, with the October payroll report indicative of longer-term trends rather than immediate stability. Bull steepening is when rates go down, all of them: short, middle and long parts of the curve. But they dont move lower at the same speeds nor at exactly the same times and in the same ways. Each piece responds to information and developments differently, sometimes focusing on separate inputs. Full story here: https://t.co/kpDiNoSfaV https://t.co/yTXoBNBQMR https://t.co/96PkwPb6mW.


Content

2024-11-12

Fed cut ST rates by 50bps so 10y soars higher by 80bps? Did the bond market completely change its mind about the Fed, the economy and inflation? No. This is just curve steepening and we see this in every cycle - even +80bps selloffs in 10y. Not unusual at all. 1. Lost in the focus on the 10s, there appears to be two different yield curves. LT and MT yields are rising fast, but the front end is doing the opposite. There's your first hint. Lower rates at the front, bull steepening. 2. This steepening often occurs during recessionary periods and this part of it reflects different responses from various sections of the yield curve to economic uncertainty and market developments. After the huge rally through summer, retracement is normal and expected. 3. What's happening now is an almost exact replay of the first couple months of the dot-com recession, uncanny parallels. Rates (ST & LT) fell while payrolls were still positive then the recession start, payrolls turned negative and LT rates soared; 10y yield increased by more than 80bps (sound familiar?) 4. Market uncertainty plays a critical role in shaping the behavior of interest rates, particularly at the long end of the yield curve. This uncertainty leads to divergence in movements between the front end and the back. In the front, uncertainty is diminishing - rate cuts are coming. At the back end, uncertainty is rising after the previous rally. 5. Overall economic indicators suggest that the economy is approaching a recession, with the October payroll report indicative of longer-term trends rather than immediate stability. Bull steepening is when rates go down, all of them: short, middle and long parts of the curve. But they dont move lower at the same speeds nor at exactly the same times and in the same ways. Each piece responds to information and developments differently, sometimes focusing on separate inputs. Full story here: https://t.co/kpDiNoSfaV https://t.co/yTXoBNBQMR https://t.co/96PkwPb6mW.


Content

2024-11-12

Fed cut ST rates by 50bps so 10y soars higher by 80bps? Did the bond market completely change its mind about the Fed, the economy and inflation? No. This is just curve steepening and we see this in every cycle - even +80bps selloffs in 10y. Not unusual at all. 1. Lost in the focus on the 10s, there appears to be two different yield curves. LT and MT yields are rising fast, but the front end is doing the opposite. There's your first hint. Lower rates at the front, bull steepening. 2. This steepening often occurs during recessionary periods and this part of it reflects different responses from various sections of the yield curve to economic uncertainty and market developments. After the huge rally through summer, retracement is normal and expected. 3. What's happening now is an almost exact replay of the first couple months of the dot-com recession, uncanny parallels. Rates (ST & LT) fell while payrolls were still positive then the recession start, payrolls turned negative and LT rates soared; 10y yield increased by more than 80bps (sound familiar?) 4. Market uncertainty plays a critical role in shaping the behavior of interest rates, particularly at the long end of the yield curve. This uncertainty leads to divergence in movements between the front end and the back. In the front, uncertainty is diminishing - rate cuts are coming. At the back end, uncertainty is rising after the previous rally. 5. Overall economic indicators suggest that the economy is approaching a recession, with the October payroll report indicative of longer-term trends rather than immediate stability. Bull steepening is when rates go down, all of them: short, middle and long parts of the curve. But they dont move lower at the same speeds nor at exactly the same times and in the same ways. Each piece responds to information and developments differently, sometimes focusing on separate inputs. Full story here: https://t.co/kpDiNoSfaV https://t.co/yTXoBNBQMR https://t.co/96PkwPb6mW.


Content

2024-11-12

Fed cut ST rates by 50bps so 10y soars higher by 80bps? Did the bond market completely change its mind about the Fed, the economy and inflation? No. This is just curve steepening and we see this in every cycle - even +80bps selloffs in 10y. Not unusual at all. 1. Lost in the focus on the 10s, there appears to be two different yield curves. LT and MT yields are rising fast, but the front end is doing the opposite. There's your first hint. Lower rates at the front, bull steepening. 2. This steepening often occurs during recessionary periods and this part of it reflects different responses from various sections of the yield curve to economic uncertainty and market developments. After the huge rally through summer, retracement is normal and expected. 3. What's happening now is an almost exact replay of the first couple months of the dot-com recession, uncanny parallels. Rates (ST & LT) fell while payrolls were still positive then the recession start, payrolls turned negative and LT rates soared; 10y yield increased by more than 80bps (sound familiar?) 4. Market uncertainty plays a critical role in shaping the behavior of interest rates, particularly at the long end of the yield curve. This uncertainty leads to divergence in movements between the front end and the back. In the front, uncertainty is diminishing - rate cuts are coming. At the back end, uncertainty is rising after the previous rally. 5. Overall economic indicators suggest that the economy is approaching a recession, with the October payroll report indicative of longer-term trends rather than immediate stability. Bull steepening is when rates go down, all of them: short, middle and long parts of the curve. But they dont move lower at the same speeds nor at exactly the same times and in the same ways. Each piece responds to information and developments differently, sometimes focusing on separate inputs. Full story here: https://t.co/kpDiNoSfaV https://t.co/yTXoBNBQMR https://t.co/96PkwPb6mW.


Content

2024-11-12

Big crash in swap spreads last week and to start this week. Contrary to what's being said about rising yields (but consistent with bull steepening) record negative spreads across the curve. Why? Rates are going down and then are going to stay there a long time. Again. 1. **Monetary System Shifts**: Interest rate swap spreads have consistently moved lower and more negative over the past year and a half. Commentary, data, the Fed, all swing wildly back and forth, swap spreads have been nearly constant going lower since last summer. 2. **Importance of Interest Rate Swaps**: Interest rate swaps are critical signals, even more important than the yield curve given their role in the global financial system. They reflect market expectations from the inside about a whole range of factors and how those are anticipated to impact future interest rates and therefore providing insights into broader economic conditions. 3. **Market Sentiment and FED Policy**: The Fed has oscillating between "higher for longer" and needing to cut rates but is now right where the swap market said it would be the entire time. 4. **Macroeconomic Indicators**: A range of macroeconomic factors, including consumer prices and labor market data, while also at times wildly back and forth are more and more coming down on the side of a weakening economy, becoming more in line with the trend in swap spreads. 5. **Future Outlook**: All swaps tell us is that the market is strongly forecasting rates to go down and stay there. We have to fill in the blanks for what that might mean, and there is no one scenario which would fit. This could be a recession, but even that can lead to multiple different near-term outcomes which eventually converge in the future the swap market has projected. The global economy has already moved in the way swaps were pricing despite so many doubts - including many who said inflation would force rates forever higher. https://t.co/CuLCx2X7K5 https://t.co/0uWzTqlJml https://t.co/kB3P2q5WY5.


Content

2024-11-12

Big crash in swap spreads last week and to start this week. Contrary to what's being said about rising yields (but consistent with bull steepening) record negative spreads across the curve. Why? Rates are going down and then are going to stay there a long time. Again. 1. **Monetary System Shifts**: Interest rate swap spreads have consistently moved lower and more negative over the past year and a half. Commentary, data, the Fed, all swing wildly back and forth, swap spreads have been nearly constant going lower since last summer. 2. **Importance of Interest Rate Swaps**: Interest rate swaps are critical signals, even more important than the yield curve given their role in the global financial system. They reflect market expectations from the inside about a whole range of factors and how those are anticipated to impact future interest rates and therefore providing insights into broader economic conditions. 3. **Market Sentiment and FED Policy**: The Fed has oscillating between "higher for longer" and needing to cut rates but is now right where the swap market said it would be the entire time. 4. **Macroeconomic Indicators**: A range of macroeconomic factors, including consumer prices and labor market data, while also at times wildly back and forth are more and more coming down on the side of a weakening economy, becoming more in line with the trend in swap spreads. 5. **Future Outlook**: All swaps tell us is that the market is strongly forecasting rates to go down and stay there. We have to fill in the blanks for what that might mean, and there is no one scenario which would fit. This could be a recession, but even that can lead to multiple different near-term outcomes which eventually converge in the future the swap market has projected. The global economy has already moved in the way swaps were pricing despite so many doubts - including many who said inflation would force rates forever higher. https://t.co/CuLCx2X7K5 https://t.co/0uWzTqlJml https://t.co/kB3P2q5WY5.


Content

2024-11-12

Big crash in swap spreads last week and to start this week. Contrary to what's being said about rising yields (but consistent with bull steepening) record negative spreads across the curve. Why? Rates are going down and then are going to stay there a long time. Again. 1. **Monetary System Shifts**: Interest rate swap spreads have consistently moved lower and more negative over the past year and a half. Commentary, data, the Fed, all swing wildly back and forth, swap spreads have been nearly constant going lower since last summer. 2. **Importance of Interest Rate Swaps**: Interest rate swaps are critical signals, even more important than the yield curve given their role in the global financial system. They reflect market expectations from the inside about a whole range of factors and how those are anticipated to impact future interest rates and therefore providing insights into broader economic conditions. 3. **Market Sentiment and FED Policy**: The Fed has oscillating between "higher for longer" and needing to cut rates but is now right where the swap market said it would be the entire time. 4. **Macroeconomic Indicators**: A range of macroeconomic factors, including consumer prices and labor market data, while also at times wildly back and forth are more and more coming down on the side of a weakening economy, becoming more in line with the trend in swap spreads. 5. **Future Outlook**: All swaps tell us is that the market is strongly forecasting rates to go down and stay there. We have to fill in the blanks for what that might mean, and there is no one scenario which would fit. This could be a recession, but even that can lead to multiple different near-term outcomes which eventually converge in the future the swap market has projected. The global economy has already moved in the way swaps were pricing despite so many doubts - including many who said inflation would force rates forever higher. https://t.co/CuLCx2X7K5 https://t.co/0uWzTqlJml https://t.co/kB3P2q5WY5.


Content

2024-11-12

Big crash in swap spreads last week and to start this week. Contrary to what's being said about rising yields (but consistent with bull steepening) record negative spreads across the curve. Why? Rates are going down and then are going to stay there a long time. Again. 1. **Monetary System Shifts**: Interest rate swap spreads have consistently moved lower and more negative over the past year and a half. Commentary, data, the Fed, all swing wildly back and forth, swap spreads have been nearly constant going lower since last summer. 2. **Importance of Interest Rate Swaps**: Interest rate swaps are critical signals, even more important than the yield curve given their role in the global financial system. They reflect market expectations from the inside about a whole range of factors and how those are anticipated to impact future interest rates and therefore providing insights into broader economic conditions. 3. **Market Sentiment and FED Policy**: The Fed has oscillating between "higher for longer" and needing to cut rates but is now right where the swap market said it would be the entire time. 4. **Macroeconomic Indicators**: A range of macroeconomic factors, including consumer prices and labor market data, while also at times wildly back and forth are more and more coming down on the side of a weakening economy, becoming more in line with the trend in swap spreads. 5. **Future Outlook**: All swaps tell us is that the market is strongly forecasting rates to go down and stay there. We have to fill in the blanks for what that might mean, and there is no one scenario which would fit. This could be a recession, but even that can lead to multiple different near-term outcomes which eventually converge in the future the swap market has projected. The global economy has already moved in the way swaps were pricing despite so many doubts - including many who said inflation would force rates forever higher. https://t.co/CuLCx2X7K5 https://t.co/0uWzTqlJml https://t.co/kB3P2q5WY5.

Trusted Source


Content

2024-11-12

China PPI BREAKDOWN: PPI y/y declined further, m/m narrowed PPI -0.1% m/m, with a -0.3% input prices and producer prices for consumption goods dropped by 0.4%. The weaker PPI numbers are influenced by insufficient market demand and falling prices for certain international commodities, NBS said. The implementation of policies to expand domestic demand has begun to yield results, improving demand in construction and driving price increases for steel and cement. For instance, after four consecutive months of decline, prices in the ferrous metal smelting and rolling industry rose by 3.4%, while non-metallic mineral products prices went up by 0.4% following three months of declines. Seasonal #coal demand for northern heating also contributed to coal mining prices, which rose by 0.1%. International trends influenced certain sectors: rising global non-ferrous #metal prices spurred a 2.1% increase in related domestic industries, while global oil price fluctuations led to lower prices in the petroleum sector, with petroleum and coal processing falling by 2.6% and oil and gas extraction by 2.4%. On a year-on-year basis, the PPI fell by 2.9%, a slight increase in decline from last month by 0.1 percentage points. Key sectors showed varied trends: prices in petroleum and gas extraction and coal mining both saw more pronounced year-over-year decreases, while ferrous metal smelting and non-metal mineral products industries narrowed their declines. Notably, non-ferrous metal smelting prices increased by 8.3% year-on-year, while cultural, educational, and sports goods manufacturing grew by 5.8%. These trends indicate that while price pressures remain in certain industries, others are experiencing a rise in production costs or demand. https://t.co/mKAX1ssSzW https://t.co/Rlgjma0B5w.

Trusted Source


Content

2024-11-12

China PPI BREAKDOWN: PPI y/y declined further, m/m narrowed PPI -0.1% m/m, with a -0.3% input prices and producer prices for consumption goods dropped by 0.4%. The weaker PPI numbers are influenced by insufficient market demand and falling prices for certain international commodities, NBS said. The implementation of policies to expand domestic demand has begun to yield results, improving demand in construction and driving price increases for steel and cement. For instance, after four consecutive months of decline, prices in the ferrous metal smelting and rolling industry rose by 3.4%, while non-metallic mineral products prices went up by 0.4% following three months of declines. Seasonal #coal demand for northern heating also contributed to coal mining prices, which rose by 0.1%. International trends influenced certain sectors: rising global non-ferrous #metal prices spurred a 2.1% increase in related domestic industries, while global oil price fluctuations led to lower prices in the petroleum sector, with petroleum and coal processing falling by 2.6% and oil and gas extraction by 2.4%. On a year-on-year basis, the PPI fell by 2.9%, a slight increase in decline from last month by 0.1 percentage points. Key sectors showed varied trends: prices in petroleum and gas extraction and coal mining both saw more pronounced year-over-year decreases, while ferrous metal smelting and non-metal mineral products industries narrowed their declines. Notably, non-ferrous metal smelting prices increased by 8.3% year-on-year, while cultural, educational, and sports goods manufacturing grew by 5.8%. These trends indicate that while price pressures remain in certain industries, others are experiencing a rise in production costs or demand. https://t.co/mKAX1ssSzW https://t.co/Rlgjma0B5w.

Trusted Source


Content

2024-11-12

China PPI BREAKDOWN: PPI y/y declined further, m/m narrowed PPI -0.1% m/m, with a -0.3% input prices and producer prices for consumption goods dropped by 0.4%. The weaker PPI numbers are influenced by insufficient market demand and falling prices for certain international commodities, NBS said. The implementation of policies to expand domestic demand has begun to yield results, improving demand in construction and driving price increases for steel and cement. For instance, after four consecutive months of decline, prices in the ferrous metal smelting and rolling industry rose by 3.4%, while non-metallic mineral products prices went up by 0.4% following three months of declines. Seasonal #coal demand for northern heating also contributed to coal mining prices, which rose by 0.1%. International trends influenced certain sectors: rising global non-ferrous #metal prices spurred a 2.1% increase in related domestic industries, while global oil price fluctuations led to lower prices in the petroleum sector, with petroleum and coal processing falling by 2.6% and oil and gas extraction by 2.4%. On a year-on-year basis, the PPI fell by 2.9%, a slight increase in decline from last month by 0.1 percentage points. Key sectors showed varied trends: prices in petroleum and gas extraction and coal mining both saw more pronounced year-over-year decreases, while ferrous metal smelting and non-metal mineral products industries narrowed their declines. Notably, non-ferrous metal smelting prices increased by 8.3% year-on-year, while cultural, educational, and sports goods manufacturing grew by 5.8%. These trends indicate that while price pressures remain in certain industries, others are experiencing a rise in production costs or demand. https://t.co/mKAX1ssSzW https://t.co/Rlgjma0B5w.

Trusted Source


Content

2024-11-12

China PPI BREAKDOWN: PPI y/y declined further, m/m narrowed PPI -0.1% m/m, with a -0.3% input prices and producer prices for consumption goods dropped by 0.4%. The weaker PPI numbers are influenced by insufficient market demand and falling prices for certain international commodities, NBS said. The implementation of policies to expand domestic demand has begun to yield results, improving demand in construction and driving price increases for steel and cement. For instance, after four consecutive months of decline, prices in the ferrous metal smelting and rolling industry rose by 3.4%, while non-metallic mineral products prices went up by 0.4% following three months of declines. Seasonal #coal demand for northern heating also contributed to coal mining prices, which rose by 0.1%. International trends influenced certain sectors: rising global non-ferrous #metal prices spurred a 2.1% increase in related domestic industries, while global oil price fluctuations led to lower prices in the petroleum sector, with petroleum and coal processing falling by 2.6% and oil and gas extraction by 2.4%. On a year-on-year basis, the PPI fell by 2.9%, a slight increase in decline from last month by 0.1 percentage points. Key sectors showed varied trends: prices in petroleum and gas extraction and coal mining both saw more pronounced year-over-year decreases, while ferrous metal smelting and non-metal mineral products industries narrowed their declines. Notably, non-ferrous metal smelting prices increased by 8.3% year-on-year, while cultural, educational, and sports goods manufacturing grew by 5.8%. These trends indicate that while price pressures remain in certain industries, others are experiencing a rise in production costs or demand. https://t.co/mKAX1ssSzW https://t.co/Rlgjma0B5w.


Content

2024-11-12

Fed statement: Fed cuts rates 25bps to 4.75%. S&P500 pushes through 6,000 on Powell.... Q: Trump might ask you to leave. Would you? A: Powell: No....... Q: Are you legally required to leave? A: Powell: No....... Powell: "gained confidence that we are heading towards 2% inflation"... Chart: S&P500 (+0.8%) and (inverted) 10yr yields (-11.6bps rally) Overall, the Fed seems to be adjusting to a potentially more uncertain economic environment, with a cautious yet flexible approach to monetary policy adjustments Today's statement appears slightly more cautious than September's. While both statements maintain economic activity is expanding at a "solid pace," the September statement showed more explicit confidence about inflation progress. The shift to a 25bps cut, along with the unified vote, suggests the FOMC is taking a more measured approach to easing, wanting to observe the effects of the previous larger cut. -------------------------------- Comparing today's and September's Statements: Labor Market Conditions: today's and September's statements acknowledge a slight easing in the labor market, with a slight uptick in unemployment, though it remains low. However, November's language about "labor market conditions [having] generally eased" contrasts with the September statements note that "job gains have slowed," signaling a more comprehensive shift in labor market dynamics. Inflation: Both statements recognize progress toward the 2% inflation target, but the September statement reflects "greater confidence" in inflation sustainably moving toward this target, suggesting that by November, there was some caution about overconfidence in inflation trends. But in Q&A today Powell: "gained confidence that we are heading towards 2% inflation"... Committee Voting: Michelle W. Bowman preferring a smaller rate cut dissented in September, whereas in November, all members voted unanimously. ----------------------------------- Federal Open Market Committee Nov. 7 Statement: Recent indicators suggest that economic activity has continued to expand at a solid pace. Since earlier in the year, labor market conditions have generally eased, and the unemployment rate has moved up but remains low. Inflation has made progress toward the Committees 2 percent objective but remains somewhat elevated. The Committee seeks to achieve maximum employment and inflation at the rate of 2 percent over the longer run. The Committee judges that the risks to achieving its employment and inflation goals are roughly in balance. The economic outlook is uncertain, and the Committee is attentive to the risks to both sides of its dual mandate. In support of its goals, the Committee decided to lower the target range for the federal funds rate by 1/4 percentage point to 4-1/2 to 4-3/4 percent. In considering additional adjustments to the target range for the federal funds rate, the Committee will carefully assess incoming data, the evolving outlook, and the balance of risks. The Committee will continue reducing its holdings of Treasury securities and agency debt and agency mortgagebacked securities. The Committee is strongly committed to supporting maximum employment and returning inflation to its 2 percent objective. In assessing the appropriate stance of monetary policy, the Committee will continue to monitor the implications of incoming information for the economic outlook. The Committee would be prepared to adjust the stance of monetary policy as appropriate if risks emerge that could impede the attainment of the Committees goals. The Committees assessments will take into account a wide range of information, including readings on labor market conditions, inflation pressures and inflation expectations, and financial and international developments. Voting for the monetary policy action were Jerome H. Powell, Chair; John C. Williams, Vice Chair; Thomas I. Barkin; Michael S. Barr; Raphael W. Bostic; Michelle W. Bowman; Lisa D. Cook; Mary C. Daly; Beth M. Hammack; Philip N. Jefferson; Adriana D. Kugler; and Christopher J. Waller. https://t.co/p3kQgfit0A https://t.co/9WcbtPLj62.


Content

2024-11-12

Fed statement: Fed cuts rates 25bps to 4.75%. S&P500 pushes through 6,000 on Powell.... Q: Trump might ask you to leave. Would you? A: Powell: No....... Q: Are you legally required to leave? A: Powell: No....... Powell: "gained confidence that we are heading towards 2% inflation"... Chart: S&P500 (+0.8%) and (inverted) 10yr yields (-11.6bps rally) Overall, the Fed seems to be adjusting to a potentially more uncertain economic environment, with a cautious yet flexible approach to monetary policy adjustments Today's statement appears slightly more cautious than September's. While both statements maintain economic activity is expanding at a "solid pace," the September statement showed more explicit confidence about inflation progress. The shift to a 25bps cut, along with the unified vote, suggests the FOMC is taking a more measured approach to easing, wanting to observe the effects of the previous larger cut. -------------------------------- Comparing today's and September's Statements: Labor Market Conditions: today's and September's statements acknowledge a slight easing in the labor market, with a slight uptick in unemployment, though it remains low. However, November's language about "labor market conditions [having] generally eased" contrasts with the September statements note that "job gains have slowed," signaling a more comprehensive shift in labor market dynamics. Inflation: Both statements recognize progress toward the 2% inflation target, but the September statement reflects "greater confidence" in inflation sustainably moving toward this target, suggesting that by November, there was some caution about overconfidence in inflation trends. But in Q&A today Powell: "gained confidence that we are heading towards 2% inflation"... Committee Voting: Michelle W. Bowman preferring a smaller rate cut dissented in September, whereas in November, all members voted unanimously. ----------------------------------- Federal Open Market Committee Nov. 7 Statement: Recent indicators suggest that economic activity has continued to expand at a solid pace. Since earlier in the year, labor market conditions have generally eased, and the unemployment rate has moved up but remains low. Inflation has made progress toward the Committees 2 percent objective but remains somewhat elevated. The Committee seeks to achieve maximum employment and inflation at the rate of 2 percent over the longer run. The Committee judges that the risks to achieving its employment and inflation goals are roughly in balance. The economic outlook is uncertain, and the Committee is attentive to the risks to both sides of its dual mandate. In support of its goals, the Committee decided to lower the target range for the federal funds rate by 1/4 percentage point to 4-1/2 to 4-3/4 percent. In considering additional adjustments to the target range for the federal funds rate, the Committee will carefully assess incoming data, the evolving outlook, and the balance of risks. The Committee will continue reducing its holdings of Treasury securities and agency debt and agency mortgagebacked securities. The Committee is strongly committed to supporting maximum employment and returning inflation to its 2 percent objective. In assessing the appropriate stance of monetary policy, the Committee will continue to monitor the implications of incoming information for the economic outlook. The Committee would be prepared to adjust the stance of monetary policy as appropriate if risks emerge that could impede the attainment of the Committees goals. The Committees assessments will take into account a wide range of information, including readings on labor market conditions, inflation pressures and inflation expectations, and financial and international developments. Voting for the monetary policy action were Jerome H. Powell, Chair; John C. Williams, Vice Chair; Thomas I. Barkin; Michael S. Barr; Raphael W. Bostic; Michelle W. Bowman; Lisa D. Cook; Mary C. Daly; Beth M. Hammack; Philip N. Jefferson; Adriana D. Kugler; and Christopher J. Waller. https://t.co/p3kQgfit0A https://t.co/9WcbtPLj62.


Content

2024-11-12

Fed statement: Fed cuts rates 25bps to 4.75%. S&P500 pushes through 6,000 on Powell.... Q: Trump might ask you to leave. Would you? A: Powell: No....... Q: Are you legally required to leave? A: Powell: No....... Powell: "gained confidence that we are heading towards 2% inflation"... Chart: S&P500 (+0.8%) and (inverted) 10yr yields (-11.6bps rally) Overall, the Fed seems to be adjusting to a potentially more uncertain economic environment, with a cautious yet flexible approach to monetary policy adjustments Today's statement appears slightly more cautious than September's. While both statements maintain economic activity is expanding at a "solid pace," the September statement showed more explicit confidence about inflation progress. The shift to a 25bps cut, along with the unified vote, suggests the FOMC is taking a more measured approach to easing, wanting to observe the effects of the previous larger cut. -------------------------------- Comparing today's and September's Statements: Labor Market Conditions: today's and September's statements acknowledge a slight easing in the labor market, with a slight uptick in unemployment, though it remains low. However, November's language about "labor market conditions [having] generally eased" contrasts with the September statements note that "job gains have slowed," signaling a more comprehensive shift in labor market dynamics. Inflation: Both statements recognize progress toward the 2% inflation target, but the September statement reflects "greater confidence" in inflation sustainably moving toward this target, suggesting that by November, there was some caution about overconfidence in inflation trends. But in Q&A today Powell: "gained confidence that we are heading towards 2% inflation"... Committee Voting: Michelle W. Bowman preferring a smaller rate cut dissented in September, whereas in November, all members voted unanimously. ----------------------------------- Federal Open Market Committee Nov. 7 Statement: Recent indicators suggest that economic activity has continued to expand at a solid pace. Since earlier in the year, labor market conditions have generally eased, and the unemployment rate has moved up but remains low. Inflation has made progress toward the Committees 2 percent objective but remains somewhat elevated. The Committee seeks to achieve maximum employment and inflation at the rate of 2 percent over the longer run. The Committee judges that the risks to achieving its employment and inflation goals are roughly in balance. The economic outlook is uncertain, and the Committee is attentive to the risks to both sides of its dual mandate. In support of its goals, the Committee decided to lower the target range for the federal funds rate by 1/4 percentage point to 4-1/2 to 4-3/4 percent. In considering additional adjustments to the target range for the federal funds rate, the Committee will carefully assess incoming data, the evolving outlook, and the balance of risks. The Committee will continue reducing its holdings of Treasury securities and agency debt and agency mortgagebacked securities. The Committee is strongly committed to supporting maximum employment and returning inflation to its 2 percent objective. In assessing the appropriate stance of monetary policy, the Committee will continue to monitor the implications of incoming information for the economic outlook. The Committee would be prepared to adjust the stance of monetary policy as appropriate if risks emerge that could impede the attainment of the Committees goals. The Committees assessments will take into account a wide range of information, including readings on labor market conditions, inflation pressures and inflation expectations, and financial and international developments. Voting for the monetary policy action were Jerome H. Powell, Chair; John C. Williams, Vice Chair; Thomas I. Barkin; Michael S. Barr; Raphael W. Bostic; Michelle W. Bowman; Lisa D. Cook; Mary C. Daly; Beth M. Hammack; Philip N. Jefferson; Adriana D. Kugler; and Christopher J. Waller. https://t.co/p3kQgfit0A https://t.co/9WcbtPLj62.


Content

2024-11-12

Fed statement: Fed cuts rates 25bps to 4.75%. S&P500 pushes through 6,000 on Powell.... Q: Trump might ask you to leave. Would you? A: Powell: No....... Q: Are you legally required to leave? A: Powell: No....... Powell: "gained confidence that we are heading towards 2% inflation"... Chart: S&P500 (+0.8%) and (inverted) 10yr yields (-11.6bps rally) Overall, the Fed seems to be adjusting to a potentially more uncertain economic environment, with a cautious yet flexible approach to monetary policy adjustments Today's statement appears slightly more cautious than September's. While both statements maintain economic activity is expanding at a "solid pace," the September statement showed more explicit confidence about inflation progress. The shift to a 25bps cut, along with the unified vote, suggests the FOMC is taking a more measured approach to easing, wanting to observe the effects of the previous larger cut. -------------------------------- Comparing today's and September's Statements: Labor Market Conditions: today's and September's statements acknowledge a slight easing in the labor market, with a slight uptick in unemployment, though it remains low. However, November's language about "labor market conditions [having] generally eased" contrasts with the September statements note that "job gains have slowed," signaling a more comprehensive shift in labor market dynamics. Inflation: Both statements recognize progress toward the 2% inflation target, but the September statement reflects "greater confidence" in inflation sustainably moving toward this target, suggesting that by November, there was some caution about overconfidence in inflation trends. But in Q&A today Powell: "gained confidence that we are heading towards 2% inflation"... Committee Voting: Michelle W. Bowman preferring a smaller rate cut dissented in September, whereas in November, all members voted unanimously. ----------------------------------- Federal Open Market Committee Nov. 7 Statement: Recent indicators suggest that economic activity has continued to expand at a solid pace. Since earlier in the year, labor market conditions have generally eased, and the unemployment rate has moved up but remains low. Inflation has made progress toward the Committees 2 percent objective but remains somewhat elevated. The Committee seeks to achieve maximum employment and inflation at the rate of 2 percent over the longer run. The Committee judges that the risks to achieving its employment and inflation goals are roughly in balance. The economic outlook is uncertain, and the Committee is attentive to the risks to both sides of its dual mandate. In support of its goals, the Committee decided to lower the target range for the federal funds rate by 1/4 percentage point to 4-1/2 to 4-3/4 percent. In considering additional adjustments to the target range for the federal funds rate, the Committee will carefully assess incoming data, the evolving outlook, and the balance of risks. The Committee will continue reducing its holdings of Treasury securities and agency debt and agency mortgagebacked securities. The Committee is strongly committed to supporting maximum employment and returning inflation to its 2 percent objective. In assessing the appropriate stance of monetary policy, the Committee will continue to monitor the implications of incoming information for the economic outlook. The Committee would be prepared to adjust the stance of monetary policy as appropriate if risks emerge that could impede the attainment of the Committees goals. The Committees assessments will take into account a wide range of information, including readings on labor market conditions, inflation pressures and inflation expectations, and financial and international developments. Voting for the monetary policy action were Jerome H. Powell, Chair; John C. Williams, Vice Chair; Thomas I. Barkin; Michael S. Barr; Raphael W. Bostic; Michelle W. Bowman; Lisa D. Cook; Mary C. Daly; Beth M. Hammack; Philip N. Jefferson; Adriana D. Kugler; and Christopher J. Waller. https://t.co/p3kQgfit0A https://t.co/9WcbtPLj62.


Content

2024-11-12

How the Popular Economic Notions are not Good Predictors for Voting Patterns and Election Outcomes: 1.The US GDP growth was strong and the strongest amongst developed economies . 2.The US consumption numbers were mildly strong , but not weak definitely 3.The US inflation has come down from the peak of post Covid 9% + to just around 2%+ 4. US wage growth was moderately up 5. US Labour market was powerful, with nearly 2 job openings for every job seeker 6. And the Economy was rated as the Top Concern by Voters. Given this backdrop, it was expected that Bidenomics and its Heir Apparent , VP Harris , would give a tough fight to the Republicans . Harris ended with around 68 million+ votes in all. Trump won with 72 million+ votes in all. In 2020, Joe Biden had got 81 million+ votes. We will know what all went wrong, but one key message is that aggregate economic figures dont work for Voters. 1. Voters vote on their own experience and to predict that segmented, granular data is needed. 2. The private capex number was not rising, meaning privately employed Voters were not so sure of continued employment 3. Consumption was strong in the wealthiest segments of the US Consumer, but the bottom three deciles were challenged 4. Employment numbers masked a huge cohort of people who just dropped out permanently from looking for employment after unsuccessfully trying for many months post the big Covid era job losses. 5. Strong Labour markets in aggregate hid the fact that huge job gains were happening in government and agency jobs and these were not spread across the economy . 6. The tighter Regulations of the Obama era, post GFC pendulum swing against businesses, are still constraining major sectors and small business owners. 7. What was hidden under the Inflation curve, from 2% to 9% to back to near 2%, was the inflation adjusted wages. These went up a huge 7% in Trump 1.0. In Biden's term, this DECLINED by 0.5% and at the time of high inflation , it DECLINED 3.8%. 8. People on the ground, in the farming communities, in the suburbs, were just not seeing the high fiscal deficit induced economic growth's benefits. Given this is a social media post, academic economists will attack it as "over simplification". But the substantive fact is , this explains the Voter behaviour and the Election Outcome. When the top 3 concerns of Voters were the Economy, Inflation and Immigration, any successful campaign by an incumbent/ Heir Apparent of the incumbent needed to address Real World issues. There is a chance that economists missed reading this. The Markets read it better, as evidenced by the huge traction of and the returns from the so called " Trump Trade". Prediction markets with all their concomitant defects, got it right while the pollsters did not get it right, yet again. Believe in the Common Sense Sagacity of the Markets . https://t.co/Oxsp8PPTHs.


Content

2024-11-12

How the Popular Economic Notions are not Good Predictors for Voting Patterns and Election Outcomes: 1.The US GDP growth was strong and the strongest amongst developed economies . 2.The US consumption numbers were mildly strong , but not weak definitely 3.The US inflation has come down from the peak of post Covid 9% + to just around 2%+ 4. US wage growth was moderately up 5. US Labour market was powerful, with nearly 2 job openings for every job seeker 6. And the Economy was rated as the Top Concern by Voters. Given this backdrop, it was expected that Bidenomics and its Heir Apparent , VP Harris , would give a tough fight to the Republicans . Harris ended with around 68 million+ votes in all. Trump won with 72 million+ votes in all. In 2020, Joe Biden had got 81 million+ votes. We will know what all went wrong, but one key message is that aggregate economic figures dont work for Voters. 1. Voters vote on their own experience and to predict that segmented, granular data is needed. 2. The private capex number was not rising, meaning privately employed Voters were not so sure of continued employment 3. Consumption was strong in the wealthiest segments of the US Consumer, but the bottom three deciles were challenged 4. Employment numbers masked a huge cohort of people who just dropped out permanently from looking for employment after unsuccessfully trying for many months post the big Covid era job losses. 5. Strong Labour markets in aggregate hid the fact that huge job gains were happening in government and agency jobs and these were not spread across the economy . 6. The tighter Regulations of the Obama era, post GFC pendulum swing against businesses, are still constraining major sectors and small business owners. 7. What was hidden under the Inflation curve, from 2% to 9% to back to near 2%, was the inflation adjusted wages. These went up a huge 7% in Trump 1.0. In Biden's term, this DECLINED by 0.5% and at the time of high inflation , it DECLINED 3.8%. 8. People on the ground, in the farming communities, in the suburbs, were just not seeing the high fiscal deficit induced economic growth's benefits. Given this is a social media post, academic economists will attack it as "over simplification". But the substantive fact is , this explains the Voter behaviour and the Election Outcome. When the top 3 concerns of Voters were the Economy, Inflation and Immigration, any successful campaign by an incumbent/ Heir Apparent of the incumbent needed to address Real World issues. There is a chance that economists missed reading this. The Markets read it better, as evidenced by the huge traction of and the returns from the so called " Trump Trade". Prediction markets with all their concomitant defects, got it right while the pollsters did not get it right, yet again. Believe in the Common Sense Sagacity of the Markets . https://t.co/Oxsp8PPTHs.


Content

2024-11-12

How the Popular Economic Notions are not Good Predictors for Voting Patterns and Election Outcomes: 1.The US GDP growth was strong and the strongest amongst developed economies . 2.The US consumption numbers were mildly strong , but not weak definitely 3.The US inflation has come down from the peak of post Covid 9% + to just around 2%+ 4. US wage growth was moderately up 5. US Labour market was powerful, with nearly 2 job openings for every job seeker 6. And the Economy was rated as the Top Concern by Voters. Given this backdrop, it was expected that Bidenomics and its Heir Apparent , VP Harris , would give a tough fight to the Republicans . Harris ended with around 68 million+ votes in all. Trump won with 72 million+ votes in all. In 2020, Joe Biden had got 81 million+ votes. We will know what all went wrong, but one key message is that aggregate economic figures dont work for Voters. 1. Voters vote on their own experience and to predict that segmented, granular data is needed. 2. The private capex number was not rising, meaning privately employed Voters were not so sure of continued employment 3. Consumption was strong in the wealthiest segments of the US Consumer, but the bottom three deciles were challenged 4. Employment numbers masked a huge cohort of people who just dropped out permanently from looking for employment after unsuccessfully trying for many months post the big Covid era job losses. 5. Strong Labour markets in aggregate hid the fact that huge job gains were happening in government and agency jobs and these were not spread across the economy . 6. The tighter Regulations of the Obama era, post GFC pendulum swing against businesses, are still constraining major sectors and small business owners. 7. What was hidden under the Inflation curve, from 2% to 9% to back to near 2%, was the inflation adjusted wages. These went up a huge 7% in Trump 1.0. In Biden's term, this DECLINED by 0.5% and at the time of high inflation , it DECLINED 3.8%. 8. People on the ground, in the farming communities, in the suburbs, were just not seeing the high fiscal deficit induced economic growth's benefits. Given this is a social media post, academic economists will attack it as "over simplification". But the substantive fact is , this explains the Voter behaviour and the Election Outcome. When the top 3 concerns of Voters were the Economy, Inflation and Immigration, any successful campaign by an incumbent/ Heir Apparent of the incumbent needed to address Real World issues. There is a chance that economists missed reading this. The Markets read it better, as evidenced by the huge traction of and the returns from the so called " Trump Trade". Prediction markets with all their concomitant defects, got it right while the pollsters did not get it right, yet again. Believe in the Common Sense Sagacity of the Markets . https://t.co/Oxsp8PPTHs.


Content

2024-11-12

How the Popular Economic Notions are not Good Predictors for Voting Patterns and Election Outcomes: 1.The US GDP growth was strong and the strongest amongst developed economies . 2.The US consumption numbers were mildly strong , but not weak definitely 3.The US inflation has come down from the peak of post Covid 9% + to just around 2%+ 4. US wage growth was moderately up 5. US Labour market was powerful, with nearly 2 job openings for every job seeker 6. And the Economy was rated as the Top Concern by Voters. Given this backdrop, it was expected that Bidenomics and its Heir Apparent , VP Harris , would give a tough fight to the Republicans . Harris ended with around 68 million+ votes in all. Trump won with 72 million+ votes in all. In 2020, Joe Biden had got 81 million+ votes. We will know what all went wrong, but one key message is that aggregate economic figures dont work for Voters. 1. Voters vote on their own experience and to predict that segmented, granular data is needed. 2. The private capex number was not rising, meaning privately employed Voters were not so sure of continued employment 3. Consumption was strong in the wealthiest segments of the US Consumer, but the bottom three deciles were challenged 4. Employment numbers masked a huge cohort of people who just dropped out permanently from looking for employment after unsuccessfully trying for many months post the big Covid era job losses. 5. Strong Labour markets in aggregate hid the fact that huge job gains were happening in government and agency jobs and these were not spread across the economy . 6. The tighter Regulations of the Obama era, post GFC pendulum swing against businesses, are still constraining major sectors and small business owners. 7. What was hidden under the Inflation curve, from 2% to 9% to back to near 2%, was the inflation adjusted wages. These went up a huge 7% in Trump 1.0. In Biden's term, this DECLINED by 0.5% and at the time of high inflation , it DECLINED 3.8%. 8. People on the ground, in the farming communities, in the suburbs, were just not seeing the high fiscal deficit induced economic growth's benefits. Given this is a social media post, academic economists will attack it as "over simplification". But the substantive fact is , this explains the Voter behaviour and the Election Outcome. When the top 3 concerns of Voters were the Economy, Inflation and Immigration, any successful campaign by an incumbent/ Heir Apparent of the incumbent needed to address Real World issues. There is a chance that economists missed reading this. The Markets read it better, as evidenced by the huge traction of and the returns from the so called " Trump Trade". Prediction markets with all their concomitant defects, got it right while the pollsters did not get it right, yet again. Believe in the Common Sense Sagacity of the Markets . https://t.co/Oxsp8PPTHs.

© 2024 — Powered by Sift

  • Velocity

© 2024 — Powered by Sift

  • Velocity

© 2024 — Powered by Sift

  • Velocity

© 2024 — Powered by Sift

  • Velocity